craic
30-04-2004, 10:23 AM
Flush Five to Survive
By Seth Jayson
April 29, 2004
Judging by the preponderance of gloomy market headlines over the past two weeks, stocks are ready for the big flush down the commode. The fear of deflation has passed us by, and consumer and wholesale prices are inching upward, despite our government's best efforts to hide that fact by excluding inconvenient data, like soaring gas and housing costs.
Wall Street is watching Alan Greenspan like a mouse eyeballing an eagle, scurrying from mini-rally to mini-rally and waiting for any sign to head underground for a while. A rate hike is on the way, that much is certain. As soon as it happens -- the Brill Cream and starched collar crowd tells us -- all stocks prices will fall. It always happens that way.
For the record, I don't believe a word of it. Like my esteemed and excellently snarky colleague Bill Mann, I've got plenty of contempt for the chattering class that aims to pass off broad Economics 101 theory as an informed prediction of our collective financial future. If you're too lazy to click that link and see what he had to say, here it is in a nutshell: In the real world, theoretical truths hold about as much water as my favorite pasta strainer.
But here's the beautiful part. Even if one of these predictions does hold, it doesn't have to wreck your portfolio. You don't have to invest in the whole market; you can pick companies that are likely to swim against the tide.
Readying the bunker
Just because I don't believe the predictions of disaster doesn't mean I ignore them altogether. Hey, I am also pretty sure that my house is not going to burn down, but I carry insurance against the possibility. Bill and I have a running, and only somewhat amusing gag of responding to worries about impending financial disasters by figuring out what kind of stuff to stock in our imaginary backyard bunkers. Usually, the joke is limited to selections for ammo, rations, and whether to stuff the mattresses with dollars, euro, or gold.
In reality, I don't think the economic outlook demands an all-, or even mostly, cash position. After all, if things don't go badly, you'll be making next to nothing on your nest egg, even if you eschew the mattress in favor of a CD or money market account. But as individual investors, it's in our best interests to consider what kind of stocks we might want to keep in our ****nal, to lock up with us in order to weather any upcoming storms.
My own suspicion is that there will be some pretty jarring economic shocks in the years ahead, but that they will be relatively short-lived. So, I tried to figure out what kind of companies would be best positioned to get over these bumps with the least damage.
What to pack
These days, I can't seem to step away from the stock screeners, so I used these handy tools to search for companies with the following survivalist characteristics:
1. Size: Not too small, not too big. Let's go with a tree analogy. I wanted to find companies that were large enough to survive any big windstorms, but small enough to have ample room to grow. Can you say mid caps? Market capitalization between $2 billion and $5 billion means you fit through the armored door.
2. Cash: Lots of it. Cash is the best protection against short-term problems. An ample war chest can fund substantial restructuring or simply allow a firm to tread water for a few quarters if sales take a turn for the worst. Thirty million dollars in cash gets you an entry ticket and all the Spam you can eat.
3. Debt: None. OK, almost none. Debt is a real killer when things go bad. You can lay off workers or shut down a plant much more easily than you can convince your bankers to stop requesting interest payments. And companies that rely on debt are going to have significant increases in interest payouts once rate hikes kick in. Anyone with under $1 million in long-term debt can get a cot next to the exhaust fan.
4. Free cash flow: The next best thing to a big pile of cash is the ability to generate more cash, and quickly. (When times are
By Seth Jayson
April 29, 2004
Judging by the preponderance of gloomy market headlines over the past two weeks, stocks are ready for the big flush down the commode. The fear of deflation has passed us by, and consumer and wholesale prices are inching upward, despite our government's best efforts to hide that fact by excluding inconvenient data, like soaring gas and housing costs.
Wall Street is watching Alan Greenspan like a mouse eyeballing an eagle, scurrying from mini-rally to mini-rally and waiting for any sign to head underground for a while. A rate hike is on the way, that much is certain. As soon as it happens -- the Brill Cream and starched collar crowd tells us -- all stocks prices will fall. It always happens that way.
For the record, I don't believe a word of it. Like my esteemed and excellently snarky colleague Bill Mann, I've got plenty of contempt for the chattering class that aims to pass off broad Economics 101 theory as an informed prediction of our collective financial future. If you're too lazy to click that link and see what he had to say, here it is in a nutshell: In the real world, theoretical truths hold about as much water as my favorite pasta strainer.
But here's the beautiful part. Even if one of these predictions does hold, it doesn't have to wreck your portfolio. You don't have to invest in the whole market; you can pick companies that are likely to swim against the tide.
Readying the bunker
Just because I don't believe the predictions of disaster doesn't mean I ignore them altogether. Hey, I am also pretty sure that my house is not going to burn down, but I carry insurance against the possibility. Bill and I have a running, and only somewhat amusing gag of responding to worries about impending financial disasters by figuring out what kind of stuff to stock in our imaginary backyard bunkers. Usually, the joke is limited to selections for ammo, rations, and whether to stuff the mattresses with dollars, euro, or gold.
In reality, I don't think the economic outlook demands an all-, or even mostly, cash position. After all, if things don't go badly, you'll be making next to nothing on your nest egg, even if you eschew the mattress in favor of a CD or money market account. But as individual investors, it's in our best interests to consider what kind of stocks we might want to keep in our ****nal, to lock up with us in order to weather any upcoming storms.
My own suspicion is that there will be some pretty jarring economic shocks in the years ahead, but that they will be relatively short-lived. So, I tried to figure out what kind of companies would be best positioned to get over these bumps with the least damage.
What to pack
These days, I can't seem to step away from the stock screeners, so I used these handy tools to search for companies with the following survivalist characteristics:
1. Size: Not too small, not too big. Let's go with a tree analogy. I wanted to find companies that were large enough to survive any big windstorms, but small enough to have ample room to grow. Can you say mid caps? Market capitalization between $2 billion and $5 billion means you fit through the armored door.
2. Cash: Lots of it. Cash is the best protection against short-term problems. An ample war chest can fund substantial restructuring or simply allow a firm to tread water for a few quarters if sales take a turn for the worst. Thirty million dollars in cash gets you an entry ticket and all the Spam you can eat.
3. Debt: None. OK, almost none. Debt is a real killer when things go bad. You can lay off workers or shut down a plant much more easily than you can convince your bankers to stop requesting interest payments. And companies that rely on debt are going to have significant increases in interest payouts once rate hikes kick in. Anyone with under $1 million in long-term debt can get a cot next to the exhaust fan.
4. Free cash flow: The next best thing to a big pile of cash is the ability to generate more cash, and quickly. (When times are