-
21-07-2017, 10:39 AM
#161
Originally Posted by sb9
It appears that market is pricing in a good HY result and some keen punters wanted to get in going by the big crossing the other day. Surprised to see how quickly it moved up over last few trading days...
B/c its tightly held
-
24-07-2017, 10:55 AM
#162
Sure I saw on Friday another decent parcel of 100k crossed @3.69 from on stocknessmonster...
-
31-07-2017, 02:13 PM
#163
2 |
5 |
1:48:34 pm |
360 |
6,000 |
$21,600 |
Off Market |
3 |
4 |
1:48:23 pm |
360 |
500,000 |
$1,800,000 |
Off Market |
4 |
3 |
1:48:10 pm |
360 |
70,649 |
$254,336 |
Off Market |
Nice
-
01-08-2017, 01:59 PM
#164
Just noticed - both analysts on 4-traders just upped their target price. New consensus target is $3.95 (up from $3.73). Nice.
Obviously - day traders don't need to apply - patience is here the game;
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
01-08-2017, 02:30 PM
#165
Member
Forecasted EPS of .28 still seems a tad lofty to me, however, looking forward to being proven wrong in the HY update.
Source for EPS number: https://markets.ft.com/data/equities...asts?s=CBL:NZC
-
01-08-2017, 03:30 PM
#166
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
01-08-2017, 04:01 PM
#167
Member
Originally Posted by BlackPeter
The forecast given in the supplementary materials to the annual report was 18-22% underlying profit growth. So a calculation of a 20% increase is $55,440 mil, which is about .235 underlying EPS. Of course this forecast could be conservative and not take into account the full impact of these acquisitions, i guess we will find out soon enough.
-
01-08-2017, 04:06 PM
#168
Originally Posted by JoeGrogan
The forecast given in the supplementary materials to the annual report was 18-22% underlying profit growth. So a calculation of a 20% increase is $55,440 mil, which is about .235 underlying EPS. Of course this forecast could be conservative and not take into account the full impact of these acquisitions, i guess we will find out soon enough.
FP as well as 4 traders work with IFRS numbers - not "underlying EPS". Maybe this is the issue?
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
01-08-2017, 04:13 PM
#169
Member
Originally Posted by BlackPeter
FP as well as 4 traders work with IFRS numbers - not "underlying EPS". Maybe this is the issue?
FT states that 2016 eps was .198 this has to be underlying eps unless i am missing something? I think 4traders was the same but the site isn't loading for me to check right now. If they were using IFRS numbers then there is even less chance .28eps is reached imo.
-
01-08-2017, 04:47 PM
#170
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks