-
Yesterday, 05:07 PM
#3271
Originally Posted by causecelebre
Looks sketchy as. You would think someone with his experience in capital markets would know this....and for a "paltry" $700k?
I think it's more about his association. He had a responsibility as a board member and on several committees whilst other directors sold hundreds of millions of stock.
It gets interesting in the fact the share price has risen since. Is the shareholders argument that the the directors speculated that it was detrimental to the share price even though in hindsight it wasn't.
-
Yesterday, 05:08 PM
#3272
Originally Posted by causecelebre
Looks sketchy as. You would think someone with his experience in capital markets would know this....and for a "paltry" $700k?
For The Keyster, That is just a few rounds of golf.
-
Yesterday, 05:10 PM
#3273
Originally Posted by Daytr
I think it's more about his association. He had a responsibility as a board member and on several committees whilst other directors sold hundreds of millions of stock.
It gets interesting in the fact the share price has risen since. Is the shareholders argument that the the directors speculated that it was detrimental to the share price even though in hindsight it wasn't.
Also I think Key’s emolument was in shares only, so he has to sell to get cash out.
-
Yesterday, 06:00 PM
#3274
Gez .. still so many political Key follower fanatics around even now .. after how many years ?
A shame that well crisped and charcoaled chips didn't seem to afford much after attention ..
Last edited by nztx; Yesterday at 06:02 PM.
-
Yesterday, 06:57 PM
#3275
Do a Google search and it’s only in NZ with our woke media that the case receives coverage.
Zero coverage over here when the lawsuit against the company (not the directors/major shareholders) was signalled.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks