sharetrader
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    813

    Default

    Thanks for posting LM

  2. #2
    Senior Member Lego_Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    591

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimy View Post
    Thanks for posting LM
    No problem - this is also quite an interesting page:

    https://www.participate.boprc.govt.nz/long-term-plan-2024-2034/whether-sell-some-port-tauranga-shares

    From the PWC report:

    PPS is now a relatively expensive source of financing - repayment would
    save $9m p.a. in interest costs (net of tax imputation credits)

    Another factor that is limiting QHL’s capacity to fund a higher distribution to Council is the costs associated with
    the PPS. These have grown significantly following the recent tri-annual base rate reset. The Financial Model
    assumes that the PPS after tax benefits are now greater than POT generates in returns (6.6% PPS cost vs 3%
    dividend + 3% capital growth).

    Repaying the PPS (which is required if QHL reduces its POT shareholding below 50.1%), is expected to deliver
    a material interest cost saving to QHL. Based on the Financial Model assumptions, an additional ~$9 m p.a. of
    free cash flow is generated (post the adjustment for the PPS tax imputation credits), which is equivalent to 17%
    and 10% of POT’s forecast dividend to QHL in FY24 and FY36, respectively.
    Last edited by Lego_Man; 03-05-2024 at 02:06 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •