sharetrader
  1. #15691
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    486

    Default

    ^From a product perspective there is some clear differences between the two which can be argued - cytology vs non-invasive, antigen vs genetic etc..... and I dont think this would be the basis on which company becomes more successful (or cash +ve first).

    From a strategic perspective there ARE major differences around how they are looking to commercialise their product and (I would argue) will judge their sucess - direct sales vs distribution network, manufacturer of kit vs lab company

  2. #15692
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,623

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiwidollabill View Post
    ^From a product perspective there is some clear differences between the two which can be argued - cytology vs non-invasive, antigen vs genetic etc..... and I dont think this would be the basis on which company becomes more successful (or cash +ve first).

    From a strategic perspective there ARE major differences around how they are looking to commercialise their product and (I would argue) will judge their sucess - direct sales vs distribution network, manufacturer of kit vs lab company
    Exactly.

    Different strategies at play - one promises huge upside while raising tens of millions of dollars to burn (and fails to deliver on milestones and expectations) while the other lays out the potential upside, after achieving profitability.
    Last edited by Balance; 19-06-2017 at 10:29 PM.

  3. #15693
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,623

    Default

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/busi...b5a504f54c2647

    Stating the obvious - not without risks.

  4. #15694
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,623

    Default

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsAVPbgU-Fg

    Sienna CEO talking about IPO.

    2,000 pathology labs - some have already adopted the test.

    PEB has 2 labs.

  5. #15695
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    242

    Default

    You and I both know that Sienna and PEB are not a direct like-for-like comparison, but it is certainly wise for us to be weary about what else is out there.

    There are five threats I can think of when making comparison between a company and anybody else:

    * Threat to their technology
    * Threat to their ability to make deals with customers
    * Threat to their market share
    * Threat to their revenue streams
    * Threat to their share price

    And I would only put Sienna as a mild technology threat (in the medium / long term) at this point

  6. #15696
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,623

    Default

    I do not see Sienna as a threat to PEB at all! They are both in the same industry however and Sienna provides an excellent comparison to PEB in terms of business strategy and path to sustainable profitability.

    PEB is using a very high cost model (burning through $100m of cash with more to be burnt) while Sienna uses a lower cost model, partnering with existing distributors and is already profitable.

    One can go broke while the other is already profitable.

  7. #15697
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trader_jackson View Post
    Haven't seen too many (if any) SSH's regarding insto's selling out...
    (that was posted 1 June - here we have it, an SSH with an insto doing quite the opposite of selling... you'd think insto's probably nearly own the whole company by now?)

    https://nzx.com/companies/PEB/announcements/303270

    Old FNZ... they nearly hold 50m shares now!
    Maybe they took advantage of the retail panic a few days back?

    Winner69, you think they did get the wink wink from DD?
    Last edited by trader_jackson; 28-06-2017 at 03:04 PM.

  8. #15698
    Guru Xerof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,005

    Default

    To be fair, FNZC Securities, have completely sold out. It's Harbour Asset Mgmt who continue buying, as they have done for years now. They are both related body corporates of FNZC Holdings

  9. #15699

  10. #15700

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •