PEB - Pacific Edge Ltd

[Leftfield]

Well said Bing

[Minerbarejet]

We also shouldn't forget that KP has been looking for something like CX bladder for years. Even to the extent of putting their own venture capital into that Predictive outfit that later went bust after CMS refused them coverage basically for not being good enough.
The question therefore still remains: Will KP adopt cx bladder?
If it is satisfied with the results then the huge savings over cystoscopy in Triage become obvious for a nonprofit organisation.

[Balance]

https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/pac-ed...trial-b-196675

Net cash outflows to operating activities according to annual reports :

To 31 March 2016 - $16.95 million
To 31 March 2015 - $12.54 million
To 31 March 2014 - $9.52 million
To 31 March 2013 - $6.71 million

[Minerbarejet]

Yeah well NBR, ODT, Sharechat and every other Google alert so far have been unable to spot the glaring error that is obvious in that article.
PEB has not traded anywhere near 9 cents recently so I wont be putting too much store in publications that cant even check the facts and just pass it on.

If in doubt, check it out.

[winner69]

Don't forget what David's idea of "successful commercialisation" really is

[Balance]

Don't forget what David's idea of "successful commercialisation" really is

As in Aborgen? 13 years after he left and it's still bleeding cash flow and losses?

BTW - did you know that Aborgen proudly announced the sale of its 10th billion seedling a few years ago? Imagine if they can charge just 10c a seedling!

[Balance]

Yeah well NBR, ODT, Sharechat and every other Google alert so far have been unable to spot the glaring error that is obvious in that article.
PEB has not traded anywhere near 9 cents recently so I wont be putting too much store in publications that cant even check the facts and just pass it on.

If in doubt, check it out.

Wow!

First time I have seen a PEB(bler) ignores and criticizes a positive article on PEB and asks readers to ignore the article!

And all due to an incorrect word 'at' instead of 'up' 9c!

[When the bass drops]

Wow!

First time I have seen a PEB(bler) ignores and criticizes a positive article on PEB and asks readers to ignore the article!

And all due to an incorrect word 'at' instead of 'up' 9c!

Balance, we'll let you know when we start taking your assertions seriously again about PEB. Don't assume there are many left who do. For as far as I can tell, you're no longer constructively contributing to the discussion.

[Minerbarejet]

Wow!

First time I have seen a PEB(bler) ignores and criticizes a positive article on PEB and asks readers to ignore the article!

And all due to an incorrect word 'at' instead of 'up' 9c!

Lol.
Did it sound like someone you know, Balance.
Take some minor item and make a huge fuss about it.
Gotcha

[Balance]

Balance, we'll let you know when we start taking your assertions seriously again about PEB. Don't assume there are many left who do. For as far as I can tell, you're no longer constructively contributing to the discussion.

I can proudly acknowledge those who have written on this forum and via PM thanking me for my contributions which have saved them from losses and/or more losses, and for assisting them to make gains.

Can you say the same for yourself or other PEB(lers)?