PEB - Pacific Edge Ltd

[Okebw]

It seems to be a point that's regularly bought up so here:

http://www.business.govt.nz/companie.../shareholdings

This lists the top 10 holders and is updated fairly regularly. No clue where you'd find the top 50 though.

[Dentie]

Nice bit in the ODT today ...

http://www.odt.co.nz/news/business/3...-commerce-site

Glad this was cleared up for some professionals...

Reaction from urologists to the new service had been positive so far, Dr Darling said.
There had been concern from some urologists who had misread an earlier statement and thought the results were being sent directly to the patient, rather than the GP.
The results could only be obtained from medical professionals, he said.

[Balance]

It seems to be a point that's regularly bought up so here:

http://www.business.govt.nz/companie.../shareholdings

This lists the top 10 holders and is updated fairly regularly. No clue where you'd find the top 50 though.

It is so out of date that it is completely and totally useless.

Compare with the latest :


1
NEW ZEALAND CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORY LIMITED
58233287


2
K ONE W ONE LIMITED
20286297

3
SUPERLIFE TRUSTEE NOMINEES LIMITED
14623498

4
FNZ CUSTODIANS LIMITED
10422959

5
MASFEN SECURITIES LIMITED
7965326

etc etc

[Okebw]

It is so out of date that it is completely and totally useless.

My bad in that case. The companies registrar has always been accurate when I've checked in the past.

[Dentie]

It is so out of date that it is completely and totally useless.

Compare with the latest :


1
NEW ZEALAND CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORY LIMITED
58233287


2
K ONE W ONE LIMITED
20286297

3
SUPERLIFE TRUSTEE NOMINEES LIMITED
14623498

4
FNZ CUSTODIANS LIMITED
10422959

5
MASFEN SECURITIES LIMITED
7965326

etc etc

6
"Balance"
?

[Schrodinger]

7
"Mac"

8
"Hancocks"

??

[Balance]

6
"Balance"
?

Haha - if only! 6 has 7.9m shares!

No 100 has 315,000 shares.

[Balance]

The whole discussion about the top 100 shareholders totally bemuses me each time it is raised. The latest one I have seen is for the two weeks prior to 23 July and shows no significant changes - as has been the case for the last 6 months.

If you call the No 1 shareholder, being institutions, increasing their collective shareholding from 45m shares to 58m shares, and Hujlich & others decreasing by several millions as showing no significant changes - then, that's ok!

Oops, NewGuy keeps digging

[Mista_Trix]

...That is infinitely more helpful than Balance's silly little games.

As I wrote before, your postings tell more about you....

This crap (from both sides) is getting really boring to read guys.
Play the ball not the man, the rest of us are pretty sick of it - and its doing a great job of clogging up the thread.

[skid]

This crap (from both sides) is getting really boring to read guys.
Play the ball not the man, the rest of us are pretty sick of it - and its doing a great job of clogging up the thread.

Done and dusted