sharetrader
Page 76 of 116 FirstFirst ... 266672737475767778798086 ... LastLast
Results 751 to 760 of 1155
  1. #751
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bolivia.
    Posts
    4,854

  2. #752
    Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    CNI area NZ
    Posts
    5,958

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sideshow Bob View Post
    Yes, thanks SSB, not much new there, except the caption: which is technically wrong. It would appear that the placer work is doing a lot better than covering costs of gold recovery. It's also paying for G&A costs (Admin) and some exploration, if it keeps on trend. This would be after paying installments to Bob Kilgour, wages and repairs on the gear, and landowners royalties. I'll certainly be looking hard at the placer costs versus income, if they are split out.

    The GEL price has dropped abruptly today, in a catchup with the TSX price I guess. I cannot explain the volume and drop over there, but there is a possibility some overseas holders have seen the presentation now placed on the GEL website, and have assumed a private placement is forthcoming. Maybe not though.

    Brent Cook has brought investors into the share as well. Back a month or three, Brent Cook was live on BTV and said it was a real possibility (or a sensible outcome) that Glass Earth would be bought out by Newmont at some stage. This would have to be one of the reasons why the Neavesville project has been proposed. Let's face it, GEL appears to have a lot of other things going on, for a small company with limited cashflow in the past. They added a new prospect (not a cheap one to maintain in future) under the nose of Newmont, for a reason.

    Perhaps the time payment setup for the new project is a way of stalling the need for new capital, in the hope that placer gold can fund a big chunk of it.
    Last edited by elZorro; 26-11-2012 at 01:58 PM.

  3. #753
    Membro gonzo56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by elZorro View Post
    Perhaps the time payment setup for the new project is a way of stalling the need for new capital, in the hope that placer gold can fund a big chunk of it.
    That would make sense.

    Yeah, the SP is just playing catch-up for sure. I do hope it doesn't go lower than 25c though!
    ..another volume record set today: 260,549
    Last edited by gonzo56; 26-11-2012 at 04:27 PM. Reason: Volume update

  4. #754
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    217

    Default

    so much activity today!

    thought i'd take advantage of the price drop myself and increase my holding a few thoasand more and drop my average purchase price

    Once they release the quarterly report i think the price is going to rally somewhat, absolute bargain at the moment in my opinion! 70oz a week they should be clearing at least 100,000USD a week currently and now its an established placer it should be able to icnrease further than that as we come into the summer months and conditions down south improve.

    I hope there is no takeover for GEL in the near future, I'm really looking forward to seeing what this could turn into

  5. #755
    Membro gonzo56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Nice Yankiwi,

    I just noticed that the next ask price is 39c(29 now), so depending on the TSX overnight there could be a massive jump tomorrow.

    Update: Today's not the day - TSX down 2.86% - Not bad though.
    Last edited by gonzo56; 27-11-2012 at 09:09 AM.

  6. #756
    Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    CNI area NZ
    Posts
    5,958

    Default

    Yankiwi's patience pays off again, fair enough. At least none of us can say the share is illiquid at the moment. My attention is on the placer, because this is an area that GEL could use to maximum advantage during difficult financing periods. I wonder if they'll think about running longer hours, and with more machines. Here's a bit about how placer and gold is formed, from a point of view of finding nuggets.

    http://www.nuggetshooter.com/article...formation.html

    Drybread only has fine gold placer, which implies that the hardrock deposit it came from was in wider veins, rather than shorter and smaller, distributed ones.

  7. #757
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1

    Default

    GEL could fit what's been publicised about the RAM 'portfolio' - do you suppose this is the receivers dumping it to fund the process?

  8. #758
    Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    CNI area NZ
    Posts
    5,958

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drp View Post
    GEL could fit what's been publicised about the RAM 'portfolio' - do you suppose this is the receivers dumping it to fund the process?
    It looks more and more like GEL is going for another PP hard on the heels of the previous ones. The TSX indicates a price.

  9. #759
    Membro gonzo56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Come on GEL, what are you up to?

    ...it's the end of the month.

  10. #760
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    217

    Default

    you were right Yan

    Revenues from placer mining operations increased significantly for the quarter to $1,079,000 (June quarter: $349,000). Gold production in September and October was considerably higher than for the winter period with the December quarter expected to increase further.
    The Company had a net loss for the three months ending September 30, 2012 of $456,000 vs $670,000 for the similar period in 2011.


    Three months ended Nine months ended Notes
    September 30, September 30,
    2012
    $''s
    2011
    $''s
    2012
    $''s
    2011
    $''s
    Revenue 1,079,000 180,000 1,595,000 607,000
    Cost of revenue (1,360,000 ) (114,000 ) (2,408,000 ) (352,000 )
    Gross (Loss)/Profit (281,000 ) 66,000 (813,000 ) 255,000 1
    Administrative expenses (122,000 ) (334,000 ) (821,000 ) (769,000 ) 2
    Salaries (net of exploration costs) (65,000 ) (69,000 ) (190,000 ) (183,000 )
    Finance income 12,000 (6,000 ) 18,000 31,000
    Non-cash items
    Stock based compensation - - (556,000 ) -
    Write down of mineral properties - (327,000 ) (6,590,000 ) (327,000 )
    Loss before & after Income Taxes (456,000 ) (670,000 ) (8,952,000 ) (993,000 )

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •