-
12-02-2015, 10:24 AM
#2881
Originally Posted by huxley
I think he means that of the 15.4m that was paid out in dividends 30% was reinvested back into sum through the DRP?
Correct - cheers.
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
12-02-2015, 10:28 AM
#2882
Originally Posted by winner69
Cash paid out for dividends shown as $5.3m in FY13 accounts and $7.0m in HY14
The $7m in HY14 accounts is last years final dividend and suggests a pretty low DRP uptake
Hi winner, you really need to look a little bit deeper. Of the 7 million paid out in 2014 nearly 2 million have been reinvested using the DRP and creating nearly 600k new shares. So yes, they pay out between 30 and 50% off the profit - and off this payout roughly 30% come back through the DRP. Clear like mud now?
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
12-02-2015, 10:36 AM
#2883
Originally Posted by BlackPeter
Hi winner, you really need to look a little bit deeper. Of the 7 million paid out in 2014 nearly 2 million have been reinvested using the DRP and creating nearly 600k new shares. So yes, they pay out between 30 and 50% off the profit - and off this payout roughly 30% come back through the DRP. Clear like mud now?
So to summarise $7.0 in cash paid and $1.8m in shares
gives about 20% of dividends reinvested back through DRP
Last edited by winner69; 12-02-2015 at 10:38 AM.
-
12-02-2015, 12:12 PM
#2884
Originally Posted by winner69
So to summarise $7.0 in cash paid and $1.8m in shares
gives about 20% of dividends reinvested back through DRP
Oh dear .... still feeling the hangover from your "kill-CRP" celebration?
2014 September
$M 3.05 dividends (1.4c)
275k shares reinvested @ $2.9131 = 0.8 M
2014 Sept reinvestment rate = 26%
2014 March
$M 7.1 dividends (3.25c)
586 k shares reinvested @ $3.388 = 1.99 M
2014 March reinvestment rate = 28%
2013 March
$M 5.37 dividends
1.099 M shares reinvested @ $ 3.388 = $M 3.72
2013 reinvestment rate = 69%
Note: numbers rounded ....
So - yes, I guess we can see that the reinvestment rate dropped in 2014 compared to 2013 (no wonder given the SP issues and all the negative publicity), but still not sure where your 20% come from?
Last edited by BlackPeter; 12-02-2015 at 12:15 PM.
Reason: Format
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
12-02-2015, 12:55 PM
#2885
Originally Posted by BlackPeter
Oh dear .... still feeling the hangover from your "kill-CRP" celebration?
2014 September
$M 3.05 dividends (1.4c)
275k shares reinvested @ $2.9131 = 0.8 M
2014 Sept reinvestment rate = 26%
2014 March
$M 7.1 dividends (3.25c)
586 k shares reinvested @ $3.388 = 1.99 M
2014 March reinvestment rate = 28%
2013 March
$M 5.37 dividends
1.099 M shares reinvested @ $ 3.388 = $M 3.72
2013 reinvestment rate = 69%
Note: numbers rounded ....
So - yes, I guess we can see that the reinvestment rate dropped in 2014 compared to 2013 (no wonder given the SP issues and all the negative publicity), but still not sure where your 20% come from?
OK I bow to your superior knowledge
Obviously my blurred vision from yesterday saw the $7.1m as Cash Out on the Cash Flow statement as what went out in cash and overlooked the Cash In from issuing DRP shares.
Still have the last word as usual .... 28% is lowish uptake eh .... but probably a high % of retail investors (and directors of course} with stuff all from instos
Sprry for questioning you in first place and wasting your time ... hope not too many ERA decisions go our way
Last edited by winner69; 12-02-2015 at 01:08 PM.
-
19-02-2015, 04:04 PM
#2886
For SUM, a big jump in price (admittedly on light volume) up 3.4% so far today! No announcement on the NZX site. Just some keen small purchasers?
Last edited by Bjauck; 19-02-2015 at 04:07 PM.
-
19-02-2015, 05:50 PM
#2887
Okay folks now don't go into shock but I have sold out my Sum holding over the last week or two, I do intend buying back a portion that makes up around 5% or so of my portfolio at some point. You may ask why? well I looked at my gain in Sum and Ryman over the last couple of years and until recently there wasn't any (My Ryman holding is currently in the red so won't be getting reduced until the next run up) Some would say why not wait until next week, well as you all know selling on report day doesn't always go well( I think Sum will have an average to good result next week by the way) As I have a lot of tech/ biotech stock heavily in the red its nice to have some money to move and play around with instead of watching most of your portfolio in stagnation mode.
Last edited by couta1; 19-02-2015 at 05:51 PM.
-
19-02-2015, 06:21 PM
#2888
Originally Posted by couta1
Okay folks now don't go into shock but I have sold out my Sum holding over the last week or two, I do intend buying back a portion that makes up around 5% or so of my portfolio at some point. You may ask why? well I looked at my gain in Sum and Ryman over the last couple of years and until recently there wasn't any (My Ryman holding is currently in the red so won't be getting reduced until the next run up) Some would say why not wait until next week, well as you all know selling on report day doesn't always go well( I think Sum will have an average to good result next week by the way) As I have a lot of tech/ biotech stock heavily in the red its nice to have some money to move and play around with instead of watching most of your portfolio in stagnation mode.
Would it not be wiser to divest yourself of the speccy in the red stocks, before they sink without trace, and hang on to your quality retirement stock.
It sounds like you are danger of using your Sum money to take more gambles on speccy bios
Last edited by ratkin; 19-02-2015 at 06:22 PM.
-
19-02-2015, 06:22 PM
#2889
That seems like a pretty big turn around given you had been one of the most optimistic posters on SUM and retirement villages generally. Any insights other than the flat share price over the past year or so?
I took a modest position in SUM recently (under $3) and see them as a long term hold (could top up at some point).
-
19-02-2015, 06:27 PM
#2890
Originally Posted by ratkin
Would it not be wiser to divest yourself of the speccy in the red stocks, before they sink without trace, and hang on to your quality retirement stock.
It sounds like you are danger of using your Sum money to take more gambles on speccy bios
Very sound advice..
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks