-
04-02-2016, 06:18 PM
#3251
Member
Originally Posted by percy
10.55 am the price will be $4.02,and at 4.35pm the price will be $3.98.
So you predict the "Summerset preliminary 2015 full year financial results will be released pre-market on Wednesday 24 February 2016" will not effect the price at all?
-
04-02-2016, 06:28 PM
#3252
Originally Posted by Jinx
So you predict the "Summerset preliminary 2015 full year financial results will be released pre-market on Wednesday 24 February 2016" will not effect the price at all?
I think a good result is already fully priced in, an average result will result in a fall, and a great result may help the share price to hold up above $4
-
15-02-2016, 01:30 PM
#3253
Member
Another site acquisition, this time in Hamilton. This is the 4th acquisition in the last 8 months after Warkworth extention (2.4Ha), St Johns (2.5Ha), Parnell (2.3) and now Hamilton (6.3Ha). Impressive growth to continue
-
16-02-2016, 11:27 AM
#3254
On my rounds and just a little behind..
Bit of action this morning. Mainly off markets though.
-
16-02-2016, 11:46 AM
#3255
Interesting ponderings from the Finance Minister. I wonder if the likes of RYM and SUM may even be directly interested in this idea ??http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/7693...-years-english
-
16-02-2016, 12:55 PM
#3256
Originally Posted by iceman
I hope not..
State Housing is not a viable business and will always need taxpayers funding.. Dependance on Govt funding can be tied up in a flood of R's... red tape, registration, restrictions, rules and regulations....Child day care businesses found this out when the 20hrs free care child funding came into being...
Also...
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-...rch-homes.html
http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/nat...contamination/
Last edited by Hoop; 16-02-2016 at 01:03 PM.
-
16-02-2016, 01:22 PM
#3257
Originally Posted by Hoop
Agreed, for some some state house tenants it might be more appropriate get Serco to house them.
However - they are a public company as well. On a second thought - Sercos trend chart (http://www.4-traders.com/SERCO-GROUP...590148/charts/) looks similar but much worse than the CEN chart you have published on the other thread ... so you are probably right: while it is possible to make money in dealing with the state (military equipment springs to mind) - it seems to be in the long run hard (or impossible) to make money by providing privatised social services ...
So - lets put this idea into the nutty basket and leave this thread better for the profitable housing of better-of retired people ...
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
17-02-2016, 10:46 AM
#3258
Actually not a bad idea. Some potential tenants, nope. But if you look at the Social Housing Register applicant stats nearly a quarter are over 55 and some 40% of all applicants are singles or couples (ie eligible for 1 bedroom).
Those over 55 would often be OK tenants, just with low incomes or health issues. If SUM or RYM, say, were to create complexes for the older age group - a demographic they certainly understand - it could work. However I see potential problems if MSD allocates tenants and the provider has to accept them no matter what, or the provider is expected to deal with or coordinate help for individual tenant issues. Either of those scenarios could soak up that subsidy in a heartbeat.
Many state house applicants have, shall we say, issues. (I have worked quite extensively in this area. Trust me on this!)
-
24-02-2016, 01:47 PM
#3259
Pretty good result and I see Norah Barlow is stepping down from the board in April. Now we have half way reasonable internal controls over when insiders can buy and sell and with this board change I might put this one back on my watch list now.
Last edited by Beagle; 24-02-2016 at 01:49 PM.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
-
24-02-2016, 01:49 PM
#3260
Originally Posted by Roger
Pretty good result and I see Norah Barlow is stepping down from the board in April. Might put this one back on my watch list now.
HI Roger, I inherited a few of these a while back so they are also on my watchlist now. Are you saying Norah Barlow stepping down is a good thing? Not sure whether to sell or hold but the announcement today reads well at face value.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks