-
25-11-2015, 01:14 PM
#1231
Originally Posted by Roger
SP increased circa 28% from $1.80 in Sept to $2.30 approx. in anticipation of a ripper announcement at the ASM. When tourism is growing at a whopping 9% per annum and there's also a strong tailwind from the lower currency both in terms of conversion of overseas earnings and N.Z. being a cheaper and more attractive place to visit with cheap airfares and lower currency is it really any surprise the market is underwhelmed with a 10% increase in profit forecast ?
The company was very explicit that the forecast included $2m of growth initiatives that were to be expenced. Without this, they would have been looking at 20% growth in NPAT. Their track record of conservative forecast means that it is likely to be upgraded.
It is also worth noting that Rob Campbell was buying at current prices.
No advice here. Just banter. DYOR
-
25-11-2015, 01:19 PM
#1232
Originally Posted by noodles
The company was very explicit that the forecast included $2m of growth initiatives that were to be expenced. Without this, they would have been looking at 20% growth in NPAT. Their track record of conservative forecast means that it is likely to be upgraded.
It is also worth noting that Rob Campbell was buying at current prices.
Yep fair comment mate and noted but OTOH just for the sake of a debate and comparison, AIR are expanding their operations and expensing much of the cost in doing so on new routes and growing profit at 100% and are on about half the PE. Perhaps its simply that the market is underwhelmed by 20% underlying profit growth given the strength of the tailwinds ?
Last edited by Beagle; 25-11-2015 at 01:22 PM.
-
25-11-2015, 01:44 PM
#1233
Originally Posted by noodles
The company was very explicit that the forecast included $2m of growth initiatives that were to be expenced. Without this, they would have been looking at 20% growth in NPAT. Their track record of conservative forecast means that it is likely to be upgraded.
It is also worth noting that Rob Campbell was buying at current prices.
Agree 100%.
Bit of weakness in sp is expected as some might want to get out, fair enough. Happy to continue to hold for long term.
-
25-11-2015, 02:50 PM
#1234
-
25-11-2015, 10:11 PM
#1235
Originally Posted by Roger
Yep fair comment mate and noted but OTOH just for the sake of a debate and comparison, AIR are expanding their operations and expensing much of the cost in doing so on new routes and growing profit at 100% and are on about half the PE. Perhaps its simply that the market is underwhelmed by 20% underlying profit growth given the strength of the tailwinds ?
I hold both AIR and THL and I'm more bullish on the later. Being an RV business with high marginal costs of meeting excess demand, it's less able to quickly leverage increased demand into multiplied profits. However they operate in a somewhat less cyclical/less competitive industry in the medium-long term and have more room for both organic growth and earnings accretive acquisitions.
Last edited by DarkHorse; 25-11-2015 at 10:28 PM.
-
27-11-2015, 12:18 AM
#1236
Originally Posted by Roger
Yep fair comment mate and noted but OTOH just for the sake of a debate and comparison, AIR are expanding their operations and expensing much of the cost in doing so on new routes and growing profit at 100% and are on about half the PE. Perhaps its simply that the market is underwhelmed by 20% underlying profit growth given the strength of the tailwinds ?
Ok Roger, you bought up AIR. So I thought I might do a comparison.
Given the level of debt and large depreciation for both companies, I think EV/EBIT is the best way to compare.
FY16 |
AIR |
THL |
Market cap |
3080 |
248 |
Debt |
1026 |
75 |
EV |
4,106 |
323 |
EBIT |
806 |
37 |
EV/EBIT |
5.1 |
8.6 |
At first glance AIR appears to be significantly cheaper. But I think we need to consider the abnormally low fuel price. In fact, a broker recently said the cost savings (on a like-for-like basis) is $363m for FY16. Now lets repeat the above table assuming FY15 fuel pricing (i.e. reduce EBIT by $363m).
FY16 (without fuel savings) |
AIR |
THL |
Market cap |
3080 |
248 |
Debt |
1026 |
75 |
EV |
4,106 |
323 |
EBIT |
443 |
37 |
EV/EBIT |
9.3 |
8.6 |
THL now appears to be cheaper.
I know this is very simplistic. AIR has dropped prices as a result of the fuel drop. But there is no doubt that a mean reversion of fuel prices is likely to leave little difference in the comparatives between the two companies. Then it is a question of which companies has better growth prospects. A regional player(AIR) or a global player(THL).
Last edited by noodles; 27-11-2015 at 12:22 AM.
No advice here. Just banter. DYOR
-
27-11-2015, 07:15 AM
#1237
Good analysis there noodles as always.
And they're amongst the award too at Deloitte Top 200 last night for the following.
Best growth strategy: Tourism Holdings
-
27-11-2015, 09:44 AM
#1238
Originally Posted by noodles
The company was very explicit that the forecast included $2m of growth initiatives that were to be expenced. Without this, they would have been looking at 20% growth in NPAT. Their track record of conservative forecast means that it is likely to be upgraded.
It is also worth noting that Rob Campbell was buying at current prices.
market must seen your post price recovering nicely
one step ahead of the herd
-
14-01-2016, 09:18 AM
#1239
one step ahead of the herd
-
20-01-2016, 12:55 PM
#1240
Country is buzzing with tourist, Chinese New Year not far off and no talk from our main cheerleader?
Are you still in Golden City?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks