sharetrader
Page 44 of 50 FirstFirst ... 34404142434445464748 ... LastLast
Results 431 to 440 of 492
  1. #431
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,244

    Default

    Under 110,000 shares to go."Piece of cake,"!!!!

  2. #432
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    Found my post 198 on this thread where I declared that TUA was NZ's best finance company.
    Can't find anywhere that I said DPC was better.


    SNOOPY
    I was referring to our debate on the DPC thread
    http://www.sharetrader.co.nz/showthr...l=1#post485182
    No advice here. Just banter. DYOR

  3. #433
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noodles View Post
    I was referring to our debate on the DPC thread
    http://www.sharetrader.co.nz/showthr...l=1#post485182
    Ah, OK thanks for that. So I did and Apples vs Oranges calculation and you corrected me.

    -------

    Noodles has pointed out that for TUA I used EBT and for DPC I used EBIT, so the above comparison is not fair. To fix this I will add back the interest paid into the TUA result.

    So the FY2014 EBIT for the DPC finance division is $3.360m - $0.01014m = $3.350m

    We also are told the segment assets for the finance division total $37,953m at years end.

    So EBIT /Segment Assets = $3.35m / $37,953m = 8.83%

    Now compare this with the equivalent TUA finance division result:

    TUAF FY2013 ($1.861m-$1.151m+$1.926m) / ($10.684m + $14.916m) = 10.3%

    and you can see that TUA makes an 'operating profit' which is one and a half basis points above the earnings of DPC for doing essentially the same job on a similar sized loan book.

    ------

    The end result, with my screw up taken out, was that TUA had the better finance business. That was the bit I remembered.

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  4. #434
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by black knat View Post
    You don't think they will get the last .4%?
    Waikare's 'hold out' is looking more important than ever. I imagine they will send all TUA shareholders another letter stating the takeover offer has been extended and hope that will shake the tree enough. Failing that, they will ring up some older shareholders and bully them with fear.

    If they do jump the 90% hurdle in the next few days, I will take cash for the balance of my holding. Like Birmanboy, I feel DPC have yet to earn my trust.

    I feel there will be an occasion over the next couple of years when I can buy DPC shares on market for less than 25c.

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 25-10-2014 at 12:05 AM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  5. #435
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,244

    Default

    With only 110,000 shares required I do not think DPC will have to shake the tree very hard.
    Once they have the 100% of TUA, I think you will find DPC's share price will move up to over 30 cents.
    You will then not see the sp drop below 30 cents again.
    You and Birmanboy will look back in a couple of years, and see in hindsight, your lack of foresight has cost you dearly.

  6. #436
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,187

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by percy View Post
    With only 110,000 shares required I do not think DPC will have to shake the tree very hard.
    Once they have the 100% of TUA, I think you will find DPC's share price will move up to over 30 cents.
    You will then not see the sp drop below 30 cents again.
    You and Birmanboy will look back in a couple of years, and see in hindsight, your lack of foresight has cost you dearly.
    :-) Totally agree Percy! (but hold quite a few so I'm biased )
    Last edited by biker; 25-10-2014 at 09:25 AM.

  7. #437
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,884

    Default

    Back of envelop stuff... please critique.

    DPC shares outstanding 494 million
    extra shares $30m/.25 = 120 million.

    Shares issued 614 million.

    Profit forecast $25 million if 100% takeover of Turners.

    EPS = 25/614 is 4.07cps

    Seems cheap to me at 26 cents?

    Ahha but then there are still those pesky bonds that need to be converted (and will probably be converted to equity) Now I do not know how many have been issued as of yet but that will have to be included in the above calculation. I do not have the info here at present but if the bond take up was about 25%, DPC seems cheap at this stage....
    Last edited by blackcap; 25-10-2014 at 09:53 AM.

  8. #438
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    Back of envelop stuff... please critique.

    DPC shares outstanding 494 million
    extra shares $30m/.25 = 120 million.

    Shares issued 614 million.

    Profit forecast $25 million if 100% takeover of Turners.

    EPS = 25/614 is 4.07cps

    Seems cheap to me at 26 cents?

    Ahha but then there are still those pesky bonds that need to be converted (and will probably be converted to equity) Now I do not know how many have been issued as of yet but that will have to be included in the above calculation. I do not have the info here at present but if the bond take up was about 25%, DPC seems cheap at this stage....
    While DPC may not pay much tax in FY16, I think it is worth normalising the NPAT figure to include full tax as they will pay tax in subsequent years. So I would use 25*.72 to get normalised NPAT $18mill. eps=2.93

    Bonds:
    It is difficult to know the impact on eps.
    If everyone takes cash, then DPC may have to do a capital raising to ensure they are well capitalised. Thus more shares on issue.
    If everyone takes shares, then there will be dilution as well.

    But the important thing to remember is that they won't be payment 9% to bond holders after 2 years. This will increase earnings and the dilution should not be material form an eps perpective.

    The tax credits they have also helps the balance sheet.
    No advice here. Just banter. DYOR

  9. #439
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    Ah, OK thanks for that. So I did and Apples vs Oranges calculation and you corrected me.

    -------

    Noodles has pointed out that for TUA I used EBT and for DPC I used EBIT, so the above comparison is not fair. To fix this I will add back the interest paid into the TUA result.

    So the FY2014 EBIT for the DPC finance division is $3.360m - $0.01014m = $3.350m

    We also are told the segment assets for the finance division total $37,953m at years end.

    So EBIT /Segment Assets = $3.35m / $37,953m = 8.83%

    Now compare this with the equivalent TUA finance division result:

    TUAF FY2013 ($1.861m-$1.151m+$1.926m) / ($10.684m + $14.916m) = 10.3%

    and you can see that TUA makes an 'operating profit' which is one and a half basis points above the earnings of DPC for doing essentially the same job on a similar sized loan book.

    ------

    The end result, with my screw up taken out, was that TUA had the better finance business. That was the bit I remembered.

    SNOOPY
    Paul Byrnes has stated that the finance division is "sub-scale". So I think we need to monitor "EBIT /Segment Assets" going forward to see if DPC can get some operational leverage. This is key to DPC FY16 forecasts.
    No advice here. Just banter. DYOR

  10. #440
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noodles View Post
    While DPC may not pay much tax in FY16, I think it is worth normalising the NPAT figure to include full tax as they will pay tax in subsequent years. So I would use 25*.72 to get normalised NPAT $18mill. eps=2.93

    <snip>

    The tax credits they have also helps the balance sheet.
    Not sure who 'they' are. But DPC currently doesn't pay tax because they are using up tax losses. TUA has just paid a special dividend to wipe out their tax credits. So AFAICT any tax credits going forwards will have to be earned. Currently Dorchester/Turners have none.

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •