sharetrader
Page 8 of 578 FirstFirst ... 4567891011121858108508 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 5773
  1. #71
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xerof View Post
    Well.....no-one?....I don't see any bids.....

    Also, if you take the time to actually read the proposal on the new issue of Preferred Stock, in the event of a (likely IMO) liquidation, the Preferred Stock holders are in line for 150% of their capital.....i.e the "Commoners" get stuffed even more than usual

    The Directors unanimous recommendation reads like a Tui's ad
    Perfect timing by some of the directors and management. Buy when everyone is still aggro at the company.

  2. #72
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    , New Zealand.
    Posts
    526

    Default

    Looks like the new Chairman has some ideas why the shareprice has been going up.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/3416...-says-chairman

  3. #73
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,678

    Default

    Always a good idea to watch carefully what directors and main shareholders are doing. Contrary to popular belief on this site, many insiders know exactly what they are doing.

    RBD is the best example.

    PPL is another.

  4. #74
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    419

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Who View Post
    Holy shiat!

    Who would want to invest in this dog?

    Diligent operating loss

    4:30AM Friday Feb 27, 2009

    Software company Diligent Board Member Services yesterday announced a US$11.8 million operating loss for the 2008 financial year.

    Diligent produces Diligent Boardbooks, a web-based system to simplify board meeting materials.

    It moved its software division from New York to Christchurch in 2001.
    The 2008 financial year was its first full year as a listed company on the NZ exchange.

    Sales for the 2008 year of US$2.93 million were up on
    US$1.73 million for the previous year. But operating expenses were US$12.87 million, including US$6.2 million for marketing and US$5.4 million in general expenses.
    Up 400% in the last year. Do you know of any more dogs Doc. I think your negative attitude is clouding your judgement.

  5. #75
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zigzag View Post
    Up 400% in the last year. Do you know of any more dogs Doc. I think your negative attitude is clouding your judgement.
    Get real! Anyone that invested in this is still down 55%. Ok so they were previously down 85%. Company value at $40m and revenue only US$3m and still making heavy losses. If this isn't a dog what is? This is very high risk.

  6. #76
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Christchurch, , .
    Posts
    2,206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rif-Raf View Post
    Get real! Anyone that invested in this is still down 55%. Ok so they were previously down 85%. Company value at $40m and revenue only US$3m and still making heavy losses. If this isn't a dog what is? This is very high risk.
    Hi Rif Raf,
    I have it on pretty good authority that this will be $1.00 by year end. I am tied up in Aussie CSG but I was tempted. This breaks even late this year. Stay onside.

  7. #77
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rif-Raf View Post
    Get real! Anyone that invested in this is still down 55%. Ok so they were previously down 85%. Company value at $40m and revenue only US$3m and still making heavy losses. If this isn't a dog what is? This is very high risk.
    Depends on your entry point surely? Those who got in at 10c would disagree with you. Those who got in at $1.00 probably long gone.

  8. #78
    Share Collector
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    3,509

    Default

    Been one of the best-performers on the NZX this year. Probably long past time to look at it...

    Has to be one of life's little mysteries as to why they have a market cap of near $50m (plus 32.7m units of pref shares, worth at least $20.6m of market cap since they convert 1:1). From the annual report, looks barely solvent, has negative shareholders equity and would seem likely to post at least one further FY loss (barring any adjustments to the value of the SSH LLC Note). Has a very high ROE if you put the negative profit over negative equity...does that count?

    At least that market cap will make it a lot easier to raise a bit more capital to get through to profitability without massive dilution. Still, at 63cps, it seems to me shareholders would need to believe they can hit at least $9m NPAT within 5 years to be worth the hold.

    Anyway, well done to any holders that got in during the low patch.

  9. #79
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    419

    Default

    Lizard. Read the PDF version of the latest quarterly update. Especially check out the graphs at the bottom of page 2. Thats my favourite graph at the moment.

  10. #80
    Share Collector
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    3,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zigzag View Post
    Lizard. Read the PDF version of the latest quarterly update. Especially check out the graphs at the bottom of page 2. Thats my favourite graph at the moment.
    That's nice, Zigzag. Nice little business. But is it enough to lead to the kind of profits that are required to justify current market cap (especially taking into account the prefs)? Quite frequently, reality sets in with tech stocks shortly after they start reporting profits and P/E ratios stand out in black and white.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •