I dont think its a case of “needing” to raise capital - more that if/when it occurs - it will have been a conscious decision to grow AU faster. Stockco historically capital constrained as privately owned and had unsophisticated funding. Mgmt believe they can triple the size of the book which is capital intensive. And want to improve the funding from relatively expensive wholesale funding to cheap deposits. That requires an ADI which os effectively what they are buying.
They obviously dont have to go gung ho and try to triple the book in the next few years. They could fund the status quo probably comfortably for the next few years. They could mix and match - optimise funding while pursuing slower growth. AU reverse mortgages could benefit from both initiatives.
Dont forget the capital requirements in NZ are rising so there will be less surplus dosh to invest in AU.
Dont have a crystal ball of what Jeff or the Board are thinking. Clearly optimising and securing sufficient capital for growth are priorities.
Good that some of the board and mgmt have chunky shareholdings.
Bookmarks