sharetrader
Page 58 of 74 FirstFirst ... 84854555657585960616268 ... LastLast
Results 571 to 580 of 882

Thread: Orion Health

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,746

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mondograss View Post
    Maybe, but he'd be damned if he did, and damned if he didn't.
    To him, yes.

    To the market, no. Market prefers he takes a lesser role given how he has well and truly spent $140m of IPO money to nowhere.

  2. #2
    Herbacious
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    440

    Default

    I'm not disagreeing that he needs to let someone else be in charge, but given how people on this forum seem to freak out that the sky is falling in every time a director of even a profitable, well-run company, sells a small fraction of their shares, I stand by my comment.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Mid of Middle_earth
    Posts
    1,025

    Default

    Having bought some at 2 bucks when I'm not prepared to buy then at their IPO price and just recently double up at 1 buck, I'm left with that only option to participate on the coming rights issue. It's been a punt after all and I could just say da pak of me trying to catch some falling knives But still, gut feel is strong on giving McCrae a second chance

  4. #4
    Senior Member moimoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Posts
    553

    Default

    R&D Expenditures

    FY2011 $16M
    FY2012 $24M
    FY2013 $27M
    FY2014 $34M
    FY2015 $49M
    FY2016 $62.8M
    FY2017 $64M
    TOTAL $276.8M

    According to todays presentation $10M savings p.a achieved from reducing headcount by 76, 40 of which came from R&D. Pro rata this maybe $5M (or thereabouts) off the FY2018 R&D expense to say $60M.

    Slide 22 shows only 13% of revenue comes from New Customers.

    Anyone know when this level of R&D spend ends?

  5. #5
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moimoi View Post

    Anyone know when this level of R&D spend ends?
    Quite easy - as soon as they run out of money (1).

    Seriously - if they are successful, than they will need a huge and consistent development effort just to keep their deployed systems running. These tools are never finished. The fact that basically every new client requires something special (different existing IT environment and for sure different requirements) means they will need to further top up on development.

    Asking when their development effort will ramp down is like asking when SAP will reduce their huge development effort.

    Obviously, though - if they are not successful, than go to (1)
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  6. #6
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,481

    Default

    Q, Is OHE being "held up " so that the "rights" issue gets across the line ?

  7. #7
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,746

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whatsup View Post
    Q, Is OHE being "held up " so that the "rights" issue gets across the line ?
    Wash your mouth out with vinegar and baking soda.

    The ever vigilant NZX and FMA would never allow such market manipulation to occur - EVER.

    For reference to how they are very vigilant at stamping out said practices, refer PEB leading to, during and after capital raisings.
    Last edited by Balance; 01-06-2017 at 11:27 AM.

  8. #8
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Wash your mouth out with vinegar and baking soda.

    The ever vigilant NZX and FMA would never allow such market manipulation to occur - EVER.

    For reference to how they are very vigilant at stamping out said practices, refer PEB leading to, during and after capital raisings.
    Actually - I don't think there is any law which stops parties interested in a stock to buy some more (unless they have insider information)? And who could tell the reason for them buying?
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  9. #9
    Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
    Actually - I don't think there is any law which stops parties interested in a stock to buy some more (unless they have insider information)? And who could tell the reason for them buying?
    Or maybe someone thinks they are a bargain as its software has some intrinsic value.Even IQE has intrinsic value

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Hi, first post. If you haven't already then head over to glass door and get some insights.

    To keep this post brief then if you get a job for 20 million that actually costs 30 million to do and then you get a job for 30 million and then use the first payment for this to complete the earlier job...then you can see where this is going.

    In the IT business (and in many others) then getting the job is the easy bit, completing it is a lot harder.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •