-
10-05-2024, 12:29 PM
#19951
Originally Posted by Mrbuyit
Yip it's great, it could probably do with a coat of oil before next summer.
With the inflation in raw material cost, and the shift in oca share price I'd say the deck would maybe cost me close to 3x as many shares now as it did then.
That says more about how cheap OCA shares are than anything else. Remembering that OCA gets the benefit of owning properties which cost more now than they did in the past to build. Inflation greatly benefits OCA.
-
10-05-2024, 12:44 PM
#19952
Originally Posted by ValueNZ
That says more about how cheap OCA shares are than anything else. Remembering that OCA gets the benefit of owning properties which cost more now than they did in the past to build. Inflation greatly benefits OCA.
I think you will find the cost of building has come down rapidly. Look at some of the packages GJ Gardiner are offering lately compared to a year or two ago.
The Government has also pledged to substantially bring down the cost of building further.
Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.
-
10-05-2024, 12:50 PM
#19953
Originally Posted by SailorRob
You're right Day Trader, they shouldn't have entertained the offer.
Like I said valuenz and I could make 100 million off the float alone without any effort at all, remember the floats growing bigly and you'd cap that at 25 x minimum, so 2.5 billion just there alone, I'd pay more for it. So just the float is worth $3.50 a share.
It wasn't about whether they should have taken the offer so much as that has nothing to do with you, but the fact they didn't and not long after it was quite apparent the property market was going to turn & that in hindsight if you had considered the macro it would have been a good time to sell.
Anyway its all theoretical.
Tell me when you have earned that easy $100M. I won't be holding my breath.
But I'll tell you one thing, selling at $1.50 and then buying back now would make a lot more.
Hindsight is a beautiful thing.
Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.
-
10-05-2024, 12:52 PM
#19954
Originally Posted by Daytr
It wasn't about whether they should have taken the offer so much as that has nothing to do with you, but the fact they didn't and not long after it was quite apparent the property market was going to turn & that in hindsight if you had considered the macro it would have been a good time to sell.
What offer are you referring to? I don't recall OCA ever having been subject to a takeover offer. Refresh my memory please, thanks.
-
10-05-2024, 01:30 PM
#19955
Originally Posted by Daytr
I think you will find the cost of building has come down rapidly. Look at some of the packages GJ Gardiner are offering lately compared to a year or two ago.
The Government has also pledged to substantially bring down the cost of building further.
Government pledge?
How many government pledges over every country in the world through all of history have achieved what they pledged.
-
10-05-2024, 01:36 PM
#19956
Originally Posted by Baa_Baa
What offer are you referring to? I don't recall OCA ever having been subject to a takeover offer. Refresh my memory please, thanks.
Not sure, I wasn't the one who originally raised it & I wasn't following OCA back then.
SailorRob might be able to help you.
Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.
-
10-05-2024, 01:42 PM
#19957
Originally Posted by SailorRob
Government pledge?
How many government pledges over every country in the world through all of history have achieved what they pledged.
The obvious point is to anybody who read what I was replying to is that we aren't in building cost inflationary times, quite the opposite, so don't rely on that to boost the SP, not in the near term anyway.
It's actually quite an easy fix for the Government, by simply allowing a lot more products in from overseas that are already approved overseas. We finally don't have a monopoly situation on GIB for example. But there's a lot more coming.
The extra bit will be if they actually manage to streamline the RMA. We will see on that one, but they seem determined and it's a cornerstone policy of the Coalition.
-
10-05-2024, 01:42 PM
#19958
Originally Posted by Daytr
Not sure, I wasn't the one who originally raised it & I wasn't following OCA back then.
SailorRob might be able to help you.
Don't bring the Sailor into it!
-
10-05-2024, 01:50 PM
#19959
Originally Posted by Daytr
Not sure, I wasn't the one who originally raised it & I wasn't following OCA back then.
SailorRob might be able to help you.
But you describe that there was an offer as if it was a fact, quite confidently. I think OCA has never been subject to a take over offer and you might be confused with ARV that in Dec 2023 turned down a takeover offer made in Sept last year?
-
10-05-2024, 02:03 PM
#19960
Originally Posted by Baa_Baa
But you describe that there was an offer as if it was a fact, quite confidently. I think OCA has never been subject to a take over offer and you might be confused with ARV that in Dec 2023 turned down a takeover offer made in Sept last year?
When I replied to his comment about the offer, I was getting confused with STU.
Which was another massive 'efficient' market f up. I bought the business for less than net working capital (mostly steel inventory) , got everything else for free.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks