1) Diplock was advised AFTER the decision was taken ... she should have noted that the conflict of interest should have been declared before the decision.Originally Posted by COLIN
2) Stat Management of Aorangi is a singular step to take. You are right that the impression that this would have no commercial implications for SCF beggars belief.
3) The reason cited is specious, anyway. The conflict can be construed between Hubbard and Botherway - it should have been declared BECAUSE Hubbard, Aorangi (owned by Hubbard) etc were the subjects of the Stat Mgmnt decision. Disclaiming harm on SCF is irrelevant and in no way a justification of a lack of conflict of interest.
4) If Botherway felt no conflict of interest existed between him deciding to put Hubbard into Stat Management because SCF put his brother in to recievership - then no conflict of interest should have been declared to Diplock.
What a complete shambles.
Diplock - just resign.
Botherway - just resign.
You are playing the NZ public for FOOLS!
Bookmarks