-
09-07-2023, 06:26 PM
#441
Another absolutely disgraceful populist policy from ACT, putting 17 year olds into the adult prison system!
David Seymour throwing more red meat to the angry ignorant rabble.
Imagine putting school age kids into the adult penal system.
Someone like Sam Uffindale's age when he was still at school & assaulted the young 1st year and broke his ribs, could have gone to prison.
Unbelievable how low this party prepared to go.
Last edited by Blue Skies; 09-07-2023 at 07:02 PM.
-
09-07-2023, 07:02 PM
#442
Originally Posted by Blue Skies
Another absolutely disgraceful populist policy from ACT, putting 17 year olds into the adult prison system!
David Seymour throwing more red meat to the angry ignorant rabble.
Unbelievable how low this party prepared to go.
The woke labour, greens and maori are going to loose this election.... thank god.
Last edited by BDL; 09-07-2023 at 07:04 PM.
-
09-07-2023, 08:39 PM
#443
-
18-07-2023, 02:55 PM
#444
Thank god for David Seymour. Cuts straight to the point on these insane policies from the radical Marama Mugabe
https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/natio...ri/ar-AA1dXfWJ
BTC went to $69K and now $16K. Good thing I’ve been warning you since it was $3K! I was right!
-
18-07-2023, 03:43 PM
#445
-
18-07-2023, 03:53 PM
#446
Originally Posted by Blue Skies
Another absolutely disgraceful populist policy from ACT, putting 17 year olds into the adult prison system!
David Seymour throwing more red meat to the angry ignorant rabble.
The interesting thing is that under the current (and internationally subscribed) system they are tried as adults for serious crimes already.
ACT was party to the change when last in power - just another dog whistle to those who don't know how things currently work.
-
18-07-2023, 07:28 PM
#447
-
19-07-2023, 08:52 AM
#448
Interesting Roger Douglas & founding ACT party member not voting ACT this election.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politi...GWPDA6QIENOZI/
To paraphrase "The only thing dumber than David Seymour's face is his parties policies".
To be truthful Sir Roger did not say that as he is not an ignoramus like myself. To quote. Sir Roger Douglas says his former party has “lost the plot” and he will not be voting for it in the coming election because he believes Act only represents the wealthy.
I would add "racist deplorables" to "wealthy" when describing ACT voters. Although as I say this I support the negative reaction to racist policies around co-governance and hospital waiting lists but would not vote ACT on this basis.
Although I see nztx's interpretation of the same article appears slightly different to mine, that said I am not entirely certain of the point he is trying to make.
Last edited by Aaron; 19-07-2023 at 09:00 AM.
-
19-07-2023, 08:59 AM
#449
Originally Posted by Aaron
I would add "racist deplorables" to "wealthy" when describing ACT voters.
On what basis?
BTC went to $69K and now $16K. Good thing I’ve been warning you since it was $3K! I was right!
-
19-07-2023, 09:09 AM
#450
Originally Posted by Entrep
On what basis?
Well ACT is polling 11-12% and assuming not everyone in the top 10% is individualistic (BlackPeter interprets this word differently) then who are the people that ACT's policies will appeal to?
Maybe my assumptions are wrong. I am not even sure what all ACTs policies are to be honest.
Last edited by Aaron; 19-07-2023 at 09:19 AM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks