Just like the Labour youth camp naming of the sexual deviant. You didn't push that too hard.
Printable View
OK. I concede. You are right. And I apologise.
Its thanks to people like you that we now know Neil Armstrong didn't walk on the moon, HAARP is there for mind control and the hadron collider causes earthquakes.
While you are at it would you mind fining out who approves teh Chem Trail plane flights
Labour cant name the sexual deviant amongst their ranks.(edit - because that issue is before the courts)But they could name the person who supplied loads of alcohol to under age minors. Never did hear the consequences of allowing minors to get so drunk they were still throwing up the next day. And what was the Supervisor doing "going to bed early"?
Even Whaleoil is interesting today
westerly
Yeah I get that. But Slater had no costs so in effect he may have not won, but did not lose either. Craig is the one looking terrible out of this whole debacle. Slater had redeeming qualities attributed to him by the judge so on the balance of probabilities he probably won.
The Herald's interesting take on events https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/a...ectid=12148840