Maybe he went Tsuba diving.
You like that one Minor? :)
Printable View
Looks to me like they both "detect" the cancer by the same technology, (the same molecular markers). One can tell you that you either do or don't have it and the other can tell that you either don't or do have it? Sounds more like a marketing advance than a science advance?
The difference explained
http://www.cxbladder.com/for-healthc...out-cxbladder/
Triage gives an accurate negative result, detect gives an accurate positive result.
Given the oft quoted 10 percent of patients with haematuria having some form of bladder cancer it would be best to get the 90 percent of true negatives off the books first,
freeing up facilities and clinicians.
All the closet scientists are going to come out now. Think I will go fishing once I have feed the chooks.
https://www.nzx.com/companies/PEB/announcements/258642
Wow, Superlife have been buying the s*** out of PEB.