Originally Posted by
Baa_Baa
Surely the other Directors with options would have secured the same or similar rights to exercise, as a quid pro quo to receiving their vote of support, otherwise it would be inequitable to those other Directors as well, albeit as you are suggesting it is inequitable to shareholders? If so, one might anticipate others exercising their options at significant discount to current share price?
How about telling the whole story, in as much as you see it. I doubt anyone is in any doubt regarding your views on the state of the company but what you are suggesting in terms of equity/inequity and what may follow, which is another dimension?