Probably just fish buying up large.
Printable View
I doubt it .The report is not likely to have been written yet .They will have had to value Ironbark and Canterbury Basin and need outside experts in this field.It is no easy task to value NZO but clearly there will be a big range in the valuation-must be over 78 cents minimum but the top end is where I have the difficulty
Well wouldn't you know it. The price range is 0.62 to 0.84. This kind of self serving BS is just endemic of what happens in the NZ equity markets.
Not a surprise.
Misrepresentation of the truth-e.g. SRK have valued the chance of commercial success at Ironbark at 5%.
This may be true(but not 5% chance)-I cannot find the methodology of the valuation.
I do know that BP only invest if 50% chance of success.
This report is so flawed OGOG will not be getting my vote.
You have to vote against the vote in order to get a chance later at disputing the valuation.
In effect you would have to be stupid to vote in favour of the OGOG scheme.
I will also not go to wellington to vote and hear a biased presentation
He who pays the piper calls the tune.
From the report....
"While an investment in an oil and gas exploration business such as NZO is inherently risky, shareholders may wish to consider their risk appetite for the Ironbark Prospect and NZO’s current and possible future exploration activities in evaluating the merits of the Scheme. "
I wouldn't think that very many invested in NZO without realising that it was "inherently risky". And so they already have a reasonable risk appetite.
Its a BS report and we all know it. They know it, everyone knows it. Its just up to enough of us Shareholders to vote NO at the meeting.
Hey fish.
I will take some time to digest the report this evening and share my thoughts for those who are interested.
I can tell you that If a shareholder does not vote then their vote is not taken into consideration. Not voting does not count as a YES.
So for us, we want as many people to vote NO as possible. Second best is for those on the fence (and possibly apathetic) to not vote at all.
We just need 25.01% of minority shareholders who do vote to vote NO to block the scheme of arrangement. So the more people who might have voted YES but don’t bother voting, the less NO VOTE shares we require to reach the 25.01% blocking vote.