Why would they be? That was their excuse for not immediately identifying themselves. If it turns out to be b/s the Peelers might charge them, but that would be a separate offence.
Printable View
https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/progr...ving-in-motels
Meanwhile, over 4,000 children living in motels under Cindy's emergency housing program as the housing crisis blows up into a housing collapse.
Well done, Cindy! You have singularly rescued the motel sector by paying well above rack rates to provide housing which you promised to sort out in your first term.
All spin and no delivery - Cindy's story continues.
No Cinderella story here - just a nightmare for the children as their fairy godmother Cindy turned out to be the wicked stepmother instead.
Yeah it's a real laughing matter dobby41. Real funny all those poor little kids being raised in that situation, while self described "large landlords" have been coining it in Capital Gains under Ardern's stewardship.
Did you ever clarify whether you were on the Labour payroll or not?
It's not her money, why would Cindy care?
https://www.gisborneherald.co.nz/loc...on-for-motels/
That averages out at $364 a night, more than double the motel’s cheapest commercial rate, which is shown online at $160 a night.
Meanwhile, public housing waiting list at record high - 3 times more than 3 years ago.
Cindy is doing such a great job, creating poverty & demand as her plan to breed more beneficiaries & Labour supporters bears abundant fruit.
As for dobby41 blaming National, how long has Cindy been in power to create such a housing disaster?
If you read the entire article it appears the accomodation provider does apply the rack rate - which varies according to certain factors. I'd give the MSD the benefit of the doubt - simply because they wouldn't, just couldn't, be stupid enough to pay more then asked for.