Snoops - look at the Cash Flow Statements for the last few years and see how much Income Tax has been paid (v the Taxation Expense)
Imputation credits are calculated from tax actually paid
Might make it a bit clearer
Printable View
Snoops - look at the Cash Flow Statements for the last few years and see how much Income Tax has been paid (v the Taxation Expense)
Imputation credits are calculated from tax actually paid
Might make it a bit clearer
Snoops - ever looked at SKC's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
SKC's ROIC over the last 4 years has averaged 10.7% with F15 and F16 being 11.0% and 11.1% respectively
PWC calculate SKC's WACC as at December 2016 at 11.8%
Sort of says all that activity is not covering it's cost of capital - OK, lets be kind and say that iSKC is just covering its cost of capital if we allow for a few 'abnormal' things and for different methods of calculating the returns
Some call this 'value destruction'
But that's all old fashioned thinking so no worries
Good suggestion Winner
Prima Facie Income tax @ 28% {A} Actual Income Tax Expense {B} Cashflow Statement Tax paid Imputation Credits Paid: D1/D2 FY2016 $55.235m $51.597m $13.062m 33%/0% FY2015 $47.840m $42.114m $29.059m 100%/0% FY2014 $35.994m $30.014m $40.017m 0%/0% FY2013 $47.018m $40.538m $36.394m 60%/50% FY2012 $50.073m $39.962m $49.325m 60%/60%
I see that SKC had a combined tax bill over the FY2012 to FY2014 three year period of $110.514m and the actual tax paid was $125.733m. This looks like they have paid all their tax due. Yet dividends paid over the FY2014 year carried no imputation credits at all! So maybe as you suggested before Winner, not all of this tax was paid in New Zealand? I guess it is a fair assumption that the SKC imputation credit balance in NZ was zero by the end of FY2014, because shareholders were not given any imputation credits over FY2014.
The amount of tax paid from the cashflow statement during 1HY2015 was $9.757m (tax paid during 2HY2015 was $19.308m). The first half year payment was apparently enough to fully impute the dividend paid on 03-10-2014 which equated to approximately $58.74m (tax paid).
$9.757m /($58.74m + $9.757m) = 14.2%
14.2% tax paid does not equate to enough tax paid to enable a fully imputed dividend at the 28% tax rate to be paid to shareholders. Hmmmm?
SNOOPY
This may be a silly question coming from someone sitting by the pool in Da Nang with this second post-lunch beer in hand, but according to this MSD paper Casinos in NZ pay a 4% duty duty on gross profit in addition to income tax. Is this duty included in some of the tax numbers you are looking at but not others? If so, would that be enough to account for difference?
https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our.../spj7-gaming-nz.doc
Additional query - does the gaming duty paid generate imputation credits (I don't know but would assume not) and, if so, would that,
together with Australian taxes paid (in all forms) be enough to account for the lack of imputation credits in SKC dividends?
P.S. Thanks for doing the hard work on this - I was having a look at SKC as a beneficiary of the continued growth in tourist arrivals
but was hesitating over the amount of planned capital expenditure + lack of credits on the dividends.
Okay - so it was a silly question.
I was curious enough to have a look at the annual report which discloses the gaming duty as a separate tax item from income tax. It also discloses a "weighted average applicable tax rate" for 2016 of 26.2% (2015 24.6%).
Further, the available NZ imputation credits in NZ were $15.5 million and the Australian franking credits $6.1 million which makes it hard to accept that the amount of income tax paid in Australia as a percentage of total income tax paid is enough to explain the low level of imputation credits on dividends.
Not a silly question
Maybe you and snoops should get together and ask the Sky City man what's the story about dividends and imputation credits instead of trying speculate
At least its non cash .....yes, we'll forgive for either paying far too much for Darwin in years gone by or failing to make it work
https://nzx.com/files/attachments/262233.pdf
(Snoops ...improves ROE next year for your analysis)