Was just pointing out the difference between NTA as reported and this net adjusted value thing.
Just thought that most on here know about and understand NTA (and you quoted the wrong number).
Doubt if most on here would understand what this net adjusted value means anyway. For those interested in learning the right hand chart on Slide 24 sort of explains where the extra $60m adjustmentscome from.
Question - Why do you think they exclude the present value of net development cashflows and earnings at both current and future developments (including The Sands and Meadowbank Stage 4 which are under construction) when calculate this net adjusted value — would make the $1.01 higher eh