Mr Shrimpton and associates would be more successful if they head to court.
The danger is after the Bell Group & others V PPCS litigation the courts may take a view that SFF is a repeat offender.
Mr Bell makes an interesting observation in this NZ Herald article about the aftermath of this litigation;
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...jectid=3581562
It is so applicable to current circumstances that I am going to quote it;
"Bell says he is not entirely convinced PPCS has learned from the messy takeover process."