Corporate morals all good ?
I understand the corrosion affected fan blades of the suspect Rolls Royce engines are now on very tight inspection intervals pending their eventual replacement when parts become available. CAA seem to be comfortable with this for reasons best known to them however I also understand that one of the engine failures (which also caused some damage to the aircraft itself) had just come off inspection.
There's no extra risk whatsoever to passenger safety flying these aircraft powered by these engines seeing as they're are under such tight inspection intervals or is there as shown by the recent failure ? This was a one off event and extremely unlikely to happen again, or is it that exceptionally unlikely ?
Surely a very small amount of extra risk to passenger safety is not being accepted for the sake of keeping the airline profitable, or is it ?