So far Mr Market holding steady around 5.80ish - see how today goes - in general nobody bidding up for $6+ at this point - perhaps all waiting for outcome to the 'negotiation'. I'll be happy with anything around the $6.20ish or more of course
Printable View
So far Mr Market holding steady around 5.80ish - see how today goes - in general nobody bidding up for $6+ at this point - perhaps all waiting for outcome to the 'negotiation'. I'll be happy with anything around the $6.20ish or more of course
Once bitten twice shy...so Mr market is very cautious this time....
MET halted on open. No announcement or halt notice yet.
Can you put a halt on a share without announcing event he halt? If a tree falls in a forest and no one hears it does it make a sound?
Are we going to see a jump in all retirement sector stocks like we did when the deal was announced first time?
trading halt just announced.
One would assume so Ogg
It does say this -Hopefully the $ 6.50 knoctout offer afterwards , here's to hoping , it will make the Friday beers taste better.
"MET has requested a trading halt while its Board considers this afternoon a final position from APVG in connection with its proposed replacement scheme of arrangement. "
UBS advised their clients yesterday....expecting $6.50
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/...ectid=12346401
I would expect $6.50. Well played APVG got what they want for the price they wanted from the beginning. I really dont mind personally as Ive done well with this one. I do feel bad for the NZX as it is another company gone
Drop dead offer by APVG.
Could be bad news (short term) if MetLife decides to go through with litigation.
Trading Halt. GLH.
New Scheme of Arrangement with EQT Infrastructure
$6 it stays.
Kim must have been reading Beagle's recent comments.
My initial reaction to $6.00 is to give them the finger.
(Not that my vote will make a difference.)
EQT drives a hard bargain and has taken advantage of the situation to lower their price from $7 (original offer price) to $6.
Directors supporting the deal (all except Kim and the one who abstained) own about 100,000 shares
That should help get the deal through at the meeting :D:p
Token gesture ...but could say they essentially voted with not much vested interest (independent?)
I'm a bit disappointed. I think APVG have got the better end of the deal. I think it will all go through OK, then they can come back for OCA.
A bit old now, but from todays Herald:
Swedes could go further than Metlife
Bupa is seen ripe for the picking, and Oceania Health also a possible target
The New Zealand Herald10 Jul 2020
Metlifecare’s on-then-offthen-on-again takeover by Swedish predator EQT has raised talk in the sector of further M&A activity involving the same business.
Once Metlife is hoovered up at the newly-lowered $6 a share, the Swedes could go even further, perhaps eyeing NZX-listed Oceania Healthcare and the unlisted Bupa NZ’s care home assets. Nothing has been said in public about this, but if that went ahead it could be a $2 billion-plus deal.
The Commerce Commission would be unlikely to look askance at the Swedes, the speculation has it, due to assets being widely held and a deep and evolving market with many operators housing the 43,000 Kiwis in retirement residences.
But due diligence might be tricky due to Covid-19.
The Swedes have around $50b under management and the only pushback could be if the limited partners in the funds say no to the general partner.
Bupa is seen to be ripe for the picking, with a good spread nationally and many large outdated properties giving opportunities to intensify accommodation. The Swedes could even partner with another investor, say Morgan Stanley, whose infrastructure fund is thought to have been interested in Metlife before this current takeover offer.
The industry is seen to have been focused on development, not mergers and acquisitions. Look out. If the talk results in any action, that could all change soon.
The right price?
The $6 per share offer for Metlife will be attractive for some but other shareholders want more, given that it is short of the underlying value of the assets.
Mark Brown, chief investment officer at Devon Funds Management, said there were clearly a lot of short term hedge fund investors looking to exit their positions.
“Many will be facing losses on this trade and will most likely be trying to minimise them in the shortest time possible. These investors have been clearly pushing Metlifecare management hard and will be very keen to accept a deal.” Brown said EQT’s current non-binding offer brings them back to the table within the range set by the valuers.
“I think a deal is very likely, albeit unfortunate for NZ capital markets.”
But Craig Tyson, head of Australasian property securities ANZ Investments, which has shares in Metlifecare, said while $6 was the right starting number it was a little light. “The range from the independent report is $5.80-$6.90, so we would be expecting a price north of the mid-point ($6.35).”
Tyson said EQT had emphasised that it was an investor with a longterm horizon and therefore shortterm house price headwinds should have little impact on the valuation of the business.
“Clearly New Zealand is a desirable place to invest for a bunch of reasons including our handling of the Covid crisis. Metlifecare is a good business with great assets and there would be few better places than NZ to invest so we have confidence in the board to negotiate the right outcome for investors.”
Private equity circling
EQT isn’t the only private equity player interested in New Zealand companies at the moment.
John Fisk, national leader of restructuring for PwC, told journalists this week that it was seeing a high level of interest from the PE sector.
“PEs are active at the moment. We are dealing with PEs that are looking at businesses I’m surprised they would be interested in.” Fisk said the interest included foreign PE investors from Australia.
“The Australians are interested in what we have got here.”
Last month the Government introduced temporary overseas investor changes so that the Overseas Investment Office must be notified of any investment in more than 25 per cent of a business or more than a quarter of a business’ assets, or increasing an existing shareholding.
Previously the OIO screened transactions over $100 million or involving sensitive land sales. The new rules will be reviewed every 90 days. Investors should find out within 10 working days if their transaction can go ahead while some may take longer to work through.
Fisk said the restrictions were something PE investors were aware of. “They can still take an interest in the company under 25 per cent.”
Fisk said investors were not focused on any particular sectors.
“It’s anywhere that is a better return than what they can get with money sitting in their bank.
“The part that I find interesting is that you have got very low interest rates, people that have got money to invest and yet we are walking into a storm of potential insolvencies.”
That could mean some PE investors pick up a good deal while others may get stung as they have in the past.
(More non relevant deleted)