I haven't followed SKO for vey long so can't comment, but I think it is fair to say that ATM was a lotto-type stock not that many years ago... and that some clearly picked the right numbers back then... 🙂
Printable View
Suggest you read up carefully and diligently on ATM and I think you will find a gulf of difference between PEB & ATM in how directors & management keep the market and shareholders informed and up to date.
As I have written, Lotto is totally transparent while PEB has been ????
Tens of thousands of tests, fictitious sales, user programs mysteriously going nowhere after being hyped up etc etc etc.
I was not referring to your continuous blatherings about PEB, nor to ATM's quality of directors and management, but rather to Nigelk's comment about a lotto stock being a stock you "put in a sum you're willing to risk, forget about it and hope it becomes your winning Lotto ticket eventually"...
But I suppose you knew that, but just couldn't help yourself having yet another dig... 😉
Balance ... firstly, I'm surprised you are still out there trying to make money and, secondly, if I'm wrong and you've already made it then I wish you would put some of it where your mouth is and sue the Directors of PEB for (in your view) being dishonest and misleading etc. Just think, if the Court agrees with you, you could hold them personally accountable.
I'm just sick of the broken record.
What makes you think that Lotto is so transparent?
There is no idea of what the outcome will be for your ticket and disappointment usually follows twice a week for those involved whereas PEB at least only disappoints twice a year and at least has some indication for the future.:)
I see a massive change of tune around here on any one of three things.
CMS
In the last stages of LCD determination
Kaiser
To publish in a prestigious journal the results of its trials and possibly what steps they will take.
Johns Hopkins
To complete its Commercial assessment of CxBladder and advise accordingly.
Meanwhile we are at the mercy of these organisations and their "ball of tar" processes.
Blaming an enthusiastic DD et al for something beyond their control is an ill-considered approach, IMHO
I guess Balance just wants to make you aware that the track record of this company needing investor funds. Now if this company was a growth company you could understand the need for money.... But is PEB a growth company? How much money have they needed so far, for the turnover they are generating? If they make a profit when will that be? I was once in your shoes until I saw the light and sold my shares in PEB, at a higher price than it is at now, but at a loss. I thank balances input into making me see clearly
Enthusiastic? Bumbling incompetent clown more like!
Beyond their control? Spending tens of millions of dollars year after year with the wrong commercialization strategy is entirely within their control.
One thing I will agree with you however (based upon feedback from my biomed contact in Florida) - PEB will get the LCD inclusion but in my contact's exact words - 'don't expect them to do it in a hurry. You cannot rush them. They will take their own sweet time.'
Never fall in love with a stock - it clouds one’s judgement.
Also, never get so negative on a stock that it also clouds one’s judgement.
You have done what most prudent investors have done - review the track record of a company (in this case, PEB) and cut your losses before the losses become even bigger.
Now, keep an eye on things - there are trigger points you need to set and be ready to be objective.
Amazing.
Am I detect ing a change of heart and a shifting of the balance so to speak.
Crikey, I actually got him to agree to something.
Open that Champers up, Mum