No matter how you cut it,slice it and dice it., the water I'm charged for; you know the stuff that flows through the unmoving pipes; its a user pays system the more i use the more i pay. the more i conserve the less i pay, its a winner.:t_up:
Printable View
No matter how you cut it,slice it and dice it., the water I'm charged for; you know the stuff that flows through the unmoving pipes; its a user pays system the more i use the more i pay. the more i conserve the less i pay, its a winner.:t_up:
There is a reason it is important whether someone is paying for costs of extraction from source, storage, treatment, reticulation, disposal or for the H2O itself. And that is once H2O is charged for separately from the supply to/from site there becomes a question of ownership. How can some body be paid for something nobody owns. Which is currently the case.
We change that at our peril.
70 % of kiwis disagree with you, think about that.
JT has surrendered to reality and truth. Not like him/her to shut up !
Sorry to hold you up guys; spent a lot of time on shares today mainly in aus and had a friend around late so put on a Lawrence Arabia cd id just scored and cooked a great pasta dinner with eggplant ,spinach,olives spicy tom sauce ,avo ,mushrooms, fetta,garlic, onion fried in avo oil whilst drinking cabinet/merlot and talking about the film festival movies we have been going to. here you go, drink it in:)
Majority of Kiwis back water tax even if they face higher costs, new poll ... cheers Jt
Labour has started something that national doesn't have the guts to do.National would rather lie and cheat their way back rather than facing the real issues they've avoided all these long years.
The detail will be created and worked out by the labour govt and thats the place to do it with full access to everything. I would rather a thorough and complete assessment then a shonky shallow mushroom approach as you seem to thrive on.
The stupidity is astounding here, thank god a new broom is coming.
Labour had 9 years with full access to whatever they wanted but still cant articulate any detail. That is incompetence.
Unless they already know the detail but arent telling. Which is dishonest.
Regardless of where you sit on the political spectrum your preferred party should have the broad detail in the lead up to an election.
Not aiming that at you personally jonu. Water use and water to use, using water.I pay a fee and thats fine.I conserve and value water more because of it. As all future payers of water use will too and the real winner here is the funds raised go back into water issues in the area its used; its so good its a winning proposition all around. Its an idea whose time has come.Im confident labour and co will thrash out the best arrangements for the whole of NZ to be proud of ,and down the track saying
NZ IS CLEAN and GREEN ..... AGAIN!
By the cube to all intents and purposes its the same and achieves the same purpose mm
Clean and Green ....AGAIN
Wouldn't it be great to find a way to get rid of that rock snot clogging our rivers too MM.
For all intents and purposes they are two completely different things. And if this is the best a Labour supporter can do in understandings the difference then heaven help us if Labour gets in.
Good luck trying to get rid of didymo - that's a hospital pass for anyone taking that one on. But lets learn shall we. The major lesson is don't let tourists in who bring this type of stuff on there shoes. And tell us who was in Govt in 2004 when Didymo was let into the country
Helen sneak it in in her handbag:)
Im optimistic mm that a way will be found to deal to rock snot in the future just as i am about stoats and ferrets being eliminated by maybe making them sterile or by some other bio/ discovery. Be great to find an alternative to 1080 which is temporary and divisive, for sure.