No matter how you cut it,slice it and dice it., the water I'm charged for; you know the stuff that flows through the unmoving pipes; its a user pays system the more i use the more i pay. the more i conserve the less i pay, its a winner.:t_up:
Printable View
No matter how you cut it,slice it and dice it., the water I'm charged for; you know the stuff that flows through the unmoving pipes; its a user pays system the more i use the more i pay. the more i conserve the less i pay, its a winner.:t_up:
There is a reason it is important whether someone is paying for costs of extraction from source, storage, treatment, reticulation, disposal or for the H2O itself. And that is once H2O is charged for separately from the supply to/from site there becomes a question of ownership. How can some body be paid for something nobody owns. Which is currently the case.
We change that at our peril.
70 % of kiwis disagree with you, think about that.
JT has surrendered to reality and truth. Not like him/her to shut up !
Sorry to hold you up guys; spent a lot of time on shares today mainly in aus and had a friend around late so put on a Lawrence Arabia cd id just scored and cooked a great pasta dinner with eggplant ,spinach,olives spicy tom sauce ,avo ,mushrooms, fetta,garlic, onion fried in avo oil whilst drinking cabinet/merlot and talking about the film festival movies we have been going to. here you go, drink it in:)
Majority of Kiwis back water tax even if they face higher costs, new poll ... cheers Jt