I dont think he is thinking at all - just regurgitating the mantra.
Printable View
PT what waterless planet are you on; its 2 c per thousand litres we are working on here.. This is NZ.
Well if it is 2c per 1,000 litres (or 1 cumec) then why did you not write that then?
Why did you first write 2c per litre
and then why did you write 0.02 cents per cumec?
You seem to think that you you can chuck out any old rubbish and have people blindly accept it?
And you think I am on a different planet?
Ok i omitted cubic on one post but not the others; you haven't been following the thread but stalking me Oh tiger tiger:scared::D
Yes I'm all for supporting tigers they are on the verge of extinction; prob more in zoos now.
www.savetigersnow.org
I already am; but can't bothered looking for the invoice again atm.Very happy to.One estimate that our volume of water used dropped by 30% when water meters were installed.Have been through this mm.
Jt i thought the water tax was to fund river remdiation, not to conserve water.
So many mixed messages coming from the labour camp!
Just go to their website it is all there. Interesting no one queries the royalty paid (resource rental) to extract oil,gas, gold ,coal, and gravel but water? Dairy farming is having major effects in Canterbury and there are large numbers of multiple corparate farms. I see no reason why they should not pay for the water used to make profits.
westerly
Thats because they are essentially finite resources whereas water, generally just falls form the sky in copious quantities
The worst polluters of the Avon River are city folk with their tyre shreds and petrol and oil on roads, washing their car suds down the drains, along with paint and any other gunk; all the fertiliser thrown on the gardens and lawns; their insistence of having loads of trees so all the leaves fall into the storm water in Autumn. Even raw sewerage. Only fair city folk should pay the same as farming folk if anything has to be aid at all.