I wonder who Winnie will take to court for leaking the latest lot of his dodgy dealings ? Last time this happened Helen Clark fired him.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/pol...ggest-breaches
Printable View
I wonder who Winnie will take to court for leaking the latest lot of his dodgy dealings ? Last time this happened Helen Clark fired him.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/pol...ggest-breaches
Thanks Balance for the article.
Agree completely.
IMHO Private land owners legal rights need protection.
In Wellington over 1700 land owners are directly affected by the Wellington City Council declaring Significant Natural Areas (SNA) over 50%+ of privately owned land. WCC assert Section 6 and 23a to 23b of the Resource Management ACt (RMA) gives them the authority.
I do not believe it does.
The SNA assertions and WCC SNA maps need to be challenged and the limits to WCC SNA "confiscation of private land" determined before the process wastes valuable time and resources.
WCC representatives assert nothing changes with the publication of their SNA maps..
This is untrue.
Land values according to a report for WCC (heavily redacted released under the Official Information Act (OIA)) states a loss of property value of 22% in one case.
Section 6 and 23a to 23b does not give them the authority to destroy private land owners rights and property value.
This matter needs to speedily cleared up by the Government setting limits of claims under Section 6c.
WCC representatives assert in most cases the land is too steep to be built on.
This is untrue. There are many examples of houses built on similar sloping sites.
On the weekend thousands turned out on the West Coast to resist other claims under the SNA provisions.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/...ation-proposal
We need to support the status quo. SNA can not apply to private land without compensation.
Private land is private land.
WCC already has as much land in Parks and Reserves as they are claiming from private property owners.
And that is enough.
As I’ve said before, you are entitled to your opinion but wtf do you feel the need to constantly make personal attacks on her?
Maybe take a good look in the mirror before criticising someone else’s physical appearance, because I doubt you are physically “perfect.” More like Trump (in all ways) than Brad Pitt.
Because that teethy grin* is now becoming a liability when it was an asset before.
Look at all the cartoons of her, will you? It was ok before to emphasize that she has such a winning teethy smile?
Gee - talk about PC gone nuts!
She is not an innocent sweet untainted politician, justakiwi, believe it or not - just another politician (albeit female and young) who has already lied and broken many promises within 2 years of office!
* The grubby one was grinning her teethy smile when she was interviewed re Shane Jones's 'red neck' retort to the protesting farmers - one big joke for her. You think that is appropriate?
It's not about being PC. Its about trying to be a decent human being and not body shaming people. You think it's ok for you to do it but would you feel the same if someone did it to your wife, your daughter or granddaughter?
You are not a nice person. There, I said it.
https://liberation.typepad.com/liber...-cartoons.html
So every cartoonists in NZ have been body-shaming her by highlighting her toothy grin?
PC gone mad!
Even if you were bullied for being whatever (as I was at school) I believe the correct attitude is to harden up, punch the bully back, and get on with life. Snowflakes abounding everywhere. That is life, there will always be nasty people around. We need to teach our kids how to cope with these nasties and fight back rather than try to insulate them.
As per the norm , completely unbalanced, colour wasted on you everything is back and white nothing in between. Give me Jacinda any second of the day over the extreme false trump tactic repetitive lying of Simon and his sad sack prosecuting bottom scraping false negative sentiment prosecuting tactics, any moment of the day. Half the nation prob on antidepressants because they've been naive enough to believe simon dooms trump tactics.
Great in theory but unless you want your bullied kid/grandkid suspended or expelled from preschool/school, it is impractical advice. The bullied kid who retaliates with violence will end up in trouble, and chances are the bully will get away with it.
Regardless, bullying anyone about their physical appearance (most of which is beyond their control) is wrong and adults should never accept, encourage, or validate it. End of story.
Grubby grubby grubby grubby grubby, get a little dirt on yer hands boy, wash that moth out with soap
GRUBBY:t_up:
I’m not justifying anything. I don’t give a **** what you think of Jacinda as a politician. You are free to think what you like.
I am telling you that bullying someone for their physical appearance is unacceptable, no matter who they are.
I despise Trump more than any human being on earth and express it often, in all manner of places, using all kinds of colourful language. But I won’t drag his physical appearance into it because even for someone as despicable as him, that is “hitting below the belt” and people with integrity and some semblance of personal moral compass, know where the line is.
You could get your anti-Jacinda message across perfectly well without crossing that line - if you chose to. But you won’t - because you enjoy winding me up. I can take it. I’m a big girl (with integrity) but I will only take it until I’m bored. Then I’ll go find something better to do :p