Shares will hit $5.00 if it does....lol.
Printable View
From todays ODT. Nothing new and their "staff reporter" didn't have to work too hard, but good publicity.
https://www.odt.co.nz/business/recor...nded-pharmazen
300,000 changed hands today at 60 cents. Agreed, that's the new price benchmark...for now ;)
All good but I am a little confused by the statement:-
We’re actively reviewing funding options to accelerate the process. The ability to maintain a very strong balance sheet through the growth and reinvestment stages provides multiple opportunities and while bank debt will form an important part, the option to bring in a strategic partner is one of several under consideration.”
I am far from knowledgable on these matters and wonder if anyone can enlighten me:-
What would such a partner contribute in product and or financials?
Would it cost PAZ's freedom so to speak?
And of course would the share price go up or be watered down?
Happily I stumbled on Paz years ago at $0.055 cents and after asb killed off the unlisted account, they just sit in the bottom draw.
Cheers
Until any deal is announced it is hard to guess the answers to your questions.
I would guess they would want a major supplier onboard, to secure supply.Owning shares in PAZ would give the supplier a good incentive to keep supplying them.Paying a good price for that pleasure they will know it will be used by PAZ for expansion,,which will mean they can supply more product to PAZ..Who that supplier is, or what they will supply we will have to wait and see.
Meat processor,Green lip mussels,Blackcurrants,Kiwi fruit.Could be one of them.
With the directors and their families owning so many shares, they will not want their holdings diluted for no good reason.
Could it be a partner with access to a more extensive distribution network? I admit I don't know enough about PAZ to know whether or not this would be a priority. percy's guess seems more likely? Any thoughts, percy or others?
Disc: Modest holding.
Possibly.
PAZ's AiOra and The 5th Quarter products, are I think, really designed for the Asian market,particularly China.
So a Chinese distribution partner would work.But it does not tie in with them being a NZ manufacturer of NZ sourced ingredients.
Other thoughts.
I am aware of ANZCO's partnership with Ziwi Pet Foods.
"Ziwi has also partnered with ANZCO Foods to form a new joint venture operation producing pet treats and oral health products. The New Zealand Natural Chews and Treats Company will also operate out of the Burnham site.
It was ANZCO's first foray into the pet food segment and will be providing Ziwi with grass fed products."
And Scales Corp joint venture with Alliance Group.
https://stocknessmonster.com/announc...cl.nzx-331627/
Talleys would work for PAZ,as they are meat,seafood and vegetable processors.
And ever hopeful me.I hold shares in Silver Fern Farms CoOp so should they turn out to be PAZ's supplier/partner...lol.
Thanks, percy. Such possibilities! But would having a Chinese distribution partner need to clash with being a NZ manufacturer of NZ sourced ingredients if China is a major target market?
Hey Percy, how many shares do the directors and their family trusts and interests control ? What percentage of the total shares is that ?
Without knowing the exact answer to that I know enough to be very comfortable conclude that its fair to say we can count on them to have a very strong vested interest in engineering the very best outcome of any possible placement or capital raise to supercharge this companies growth going forward.
Hi All - First time on this post and whilst late to the party still see a lot of run way here. I am in the strange position of being totally cashed up at present and was looking at opportunities yesterday to enter some of my favourite stocks but alas they are all more expensive now and my cunning plan of well priced entry on Monday has failed dismally. So am now keen to cast the net a bit wider and reading this forum this looks to be a great opportunity especially on the forward PE for a company with so much potential. Just a quick query......I look at BLT with a market Cap of $94M compared to PAZ at $125M and not sure if its a good comparison but I see a lot more potential with PAZ although not listed on the NZX or the same liquidity - would appreciate any thoughts?
Total shares on issue are 218,779,344.
Directors and their families just over 107 mil shares,close to 49%.
Add in The Paterson family and a former director, say another 15.3 mil shares approx 7%
So the answer is approx 56%.However I would figure I have missed some so lets settle at close to 60%.