sharetrader
Page 8 of 104 FirstFirst ... 4567891011121858 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 1033
  1. #71
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tim23 View Post
    Nice rise this week on decent volume liking this stock
    Bought in at $1.00. Was hoping for a little lower but the intraday $1.03 got me a little worried I'd miss out.

  2. #72
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,912

    Default

    Article nothing to do with Evolve - but highlights that the business model is not sustainable: corporate and shareholder greed will see to that.

    http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/its-shocki...17-gsrjuq.html
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  3. #73
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Article nothing to do with Evolve - but highlights that the business model is not sustainable: corporate and shareholder greed will see to that.

    http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/its-shocki...17-gsrjuq.html
    As in any business if you give the customer what they want you will get what you want.
    Failure to be customer focussed, your chances of staying in business are nil.
    If EVO can retain being customer focussed,their prospects remain good.
    It should be noted EVO's directors and CEO come from very successful customer focussed businesses.
    Last edited by percy; 20-11-2016 at 08:48 AM.

  4. #74
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Article nothing to do with Evolve - but highlights that the business model is not sustainable: corporate and shareholder greed will see to that.

    http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/its-shocki...17-gsrjuq.html
    As posted before, from inside sources that's pretty much how I have heard Evolve has been run and the results in terms of the poor share price performance since listing speak for themselves. The shares are lower than when they listed just on two years ago and in the same period of time the NZX50 is up 25% including dividends. Even taking into account dividends paid by EVO their listed performance has been poor. The child care centre I referred too in early posts finally got their heat pumps, otherwise its still being run as before. Mrs Barlow as the chair...enough said
    Last edited by Beagle; 20-11-2016 at 09:20 AM.
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  5. #75
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    626

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Article nothing to do with Evolve - but highlights that the business model is not sustainable: corporate and shareholder greed will see to that.
    There are a number of private equity firms that look to buy well, make short-term improvements in reported profitability and flip the companies based on the new, higher earnings that their "efficient management" have generated. Buying into their IPO's can be a value destroying exercise.

    I'm not sure if the private equity firm in the article is operating with this model but it may be. If it is, this article says essentially nothing about the operating model of early childhood centers and everything about private equity trying to squeeze improved profitability (before flipping). With Evolve being a long-term holder it should be concerned with both short-term reported profits and issues like reputation that will impact longer-term profitability.

    Also Evolve is a larger group within the sector. This should assist its centers to be slightly more profitable than your "average" center due to scale efficiencies. If the Government then funds sufficiently for modest profitability to exist, Evolves business model can generate could sustainable profitability.

    Disc holder.

  6. #76
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrunch View Post
    There are a number of private equity firms that look to buy well, make short-term improvements in reported profitability and flip the companies based on the new, higher earnings that their "efficient management" have generated. Buying into their IPO's can be a value destroying exercise.

    I'm not sure if the private equity firm in the article is operating with this model but it may be. If it is, this article says essentially nothing about the operating model of early childhood centers and everything about private equity trying to squeeze improved profitability (before flipping). With Evolve being a long-term holder it should be concerned with both short-term reported profits and issues like reputation that will impact longer-term profitability.

    Also Evolve is a larger group within the sector. This should assist its centers to be slightly more profitable than your "average" center due to scale efficiencies. If the Government then funds sufficiently for modest profitability to exist, Evolves business model can generate could sustainable profitability.

    Disc holder.
    Said like a true investor and probably expecting / demanding higher profits year after year.

    Hope not too much of these profits come from what Evolve call 'parental increases' and 'cost constraint'. We know what those terms mean eh

    I sometimes wonder if the $20m of profits were reinvested back into the children's development would result in a better outcome for the children/caregivers. Or maybe some price relief would make care more affordable for caregivers.

    It just seems that of the $135m of fees/income some $20m going into shareholders pockets seems rather excessive ......probably at the expense of the children/parents ........and not sustainable.
    Last edited by winner69; 20-11-2016 at 05:02 PM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  7. #77
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,912

    Default

    Lots of shares come out escrow next month.

    Those involved say they are committed shareholders and have no intention of selling

    That's good
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  8. #78
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    Masterton, , NZ.
    Posts
    2,253

    Default

    Result must be due any day now?

  9. #79
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,912

    Default

    "Parental increases' can't be too bad - Evolve have a NPS of +37

    “Our families rave about our centres” it is said
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  10. #80
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    526

    Default

    CEO Alan Wham made a presentation at the Shareholders Association meeting last week and noodles and I had a good chance to chat to him at length afterwards. He seems a very genuine and down to earth guy, and with a heartfelt concern for the teachers and children. Nothing "private equity...flip the company" about his attitude. He did say centre managers are crucial - they are like business owner/managers - which I think is the right way to see it.
    He had tremendous mentoring at 3M and a great track record with Pharmacy Brands - he took them from a small operator with $5m mcap to $170m mcap over 10 years. He sees similarities in childcare also being a fragmented sector where it's about a public service provided by professionals who are passionate about what they do.
    Evolve are not going to shoot the lights out, but look pretty low risk and inexpensive to me for a well-managed company with good cashflows and steady growth prospects over several years
    There are a string of great companies which investors have lost interest in for a year or two after the initial IPO hype - Collins Foods is my favourite example of many (esp on the ASX). It's the kind of irrational investor behaviour which creates opportunities.
    Last edited by DarkHorse; 20-11-2016 at 09:48 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •