sharetrader
Page 106 of 465 FirstFirst ... 65696102103104105106107108109110116156206 ... LastLast
Results 1,051 to 1,060 of 4649

Thread: Harmoney

  1. #1051
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    3,240

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darchie View Post
    Best email HM direct, as far as i can see only year ending 2016 is on their site
    Well that is the latest one and is required for Tax Return. 2017 is yet to happen.

  2. #1052
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darchie View Post
    Best email HM direct, as far as i can see only year ending 2016 is on their site
    Thanks Knot, Darchie and 777 for the quick response. 2015/2016 has this information - but the statement 2014/2015 doesn't... :-( So back to HM to get some details ...

    Anyway - not too pleased about the lack of information around the write-offs and their new fee structure setup.
    They simply could have allowed investors who bought notes from their already owned 'to be rewritten loan' waive the principal fee part as it transfers into the new loan anyway. Many benefits for everyone from such an approach ..
    The incentive 'invest more and get a better deal' doesn't stack up as there are simply not enough loans available to invest in, and as per Harmoney's top dog adviser's statement 'diversification' is important to stay within the RAR averaged data.

    And for that reason ... 'I'm out' ...

    I gave it a 1 year trial with $10k and if things would change again, I might re-consider putting in more. For now, it's solely going to be 'Withdraw funds' from now on.

  3. #1053
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Lets face it. As retail investors, we are just a bunch bottomfeeders. We provide only 25 percent of the funds that sustains the loan market. If all of us dissapeared tomorrow, HM would still function and be going strong. Institutional lenders can absorb the fees and delinquencies quite easily. From a business perspective: HM doesnt really owe us anything. If you dont like the fees. Then dont invest after mid june.

  4. #1054
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Broke View Post
    Lets face it. As retail investors, we are just a bunch bottomfeeders. We provide only 25 percent of the funds that sustains the loan market. If all of us dissapeared tomorrow, HM would still function and be going strong. Institutional lenders can absorb the fees and delinquencies quite easily. From a business perspective: HM doesnt really owe us anything. If you dont like the fees. Then dont invest after mid june.
    I tend to agree. But what would make it a whole lot easier to continue to invest with Harmoney (albeit with a lower return due to the new fees) would be the option to automate investment. Investing at the moment is very time consuming, having to login frequently to find out what funds you have awaiting investment, then not having suitable investments available meaning you need to keep on checking until you are fully invested. The returns could never be good enough to justify the work involved currently. I hope they really are working on a good fix for this - and before I get bored with the platform.

  5. #1055
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Art View Post
    I tend to agree. But what would make it a whole lot easier to continue to invest with Harmoney (albeit with a lower return due to the new fees) would be the option to automate investment. Investing at the moment is very time consuming, having to login frequently to find out what funds you have awaiting investment, then not having suitable investments available meaning you need to keep on checking until you are fully invested. The returns could never be good enough to justify the work involved currently. I hope they really are working on a good fix for this - and before I get bored with the platform.
    better put alotta notes per loan then. Auto invest probably wont be available for a long time

  6. #1056
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    153

    Default

    Everyone, don't panic!; I have made a few calculations from my own experience.
    Investing for over 12 months now and my Rar is about 14%.

    From the account summary page, my principal received repayments in $ terms are about 45% of my total loan investments to date.
    I have had over 500 original loans which represent a good cross-section of the loans in the market, I expect the repayment % to continue in the future.

    So till now P+I fees are 1.25%. Breaking down the fee components, 17% of the fee was for my interest received and the remaining 83% was for principal.

    Hypothetically from June 13 (plus 30 days) if the gross interest payment fee was 20% and I applied it to my current calculation above, the fee increase would be 175%.
    From the email it appears that it applies to new loans taken and so the total fee creep of 175% on all my investments would take 2 more years.

    Harmoney are excited that they have delivered returns above their target so I guess they want to grab some of this lovely lolly for themselves.
    Even after the increase I think my Rar will still be over 11.5%.

  7. #1057
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by permutation View Post
    .

    So till now P+I fees are 1.25%. Breaking down the fee components, 17% of the fee was for my interest received and the remaining 83% was for principal.

    Hypothetically from June 13 (plus 30 days) if the gross interest payment fee was 20% and I applied it to my current calculation above, the fee increase would be 175%.
    .
    So what percentage of interest has the fee been. It sounds like you've been hit by heaps of rewrites if it's that high.

    Fees/interest is about 5% so this will be a 3-4x increase in fees.

  8. #1058
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by permutation View Post
    Everyone, don't panic!; I have made a few calculations from my own experience.
    Investing for over 12 months now and my Rar is about 14%.

    From the account summary page, my principal received repayments in $ terms are about 45% of my total loan investments to date.
    I have had over 500 original loans which represent a good cross-section of the loans in the market, I expect the repayment % to continue in the future.

    So till now P+I fees are 1.25%. Breaking down the fee components, 17% of the fee was for my interest received and the remaining 83% was for principal.

    Hypothetically from June 13 (plus 30 days) if the gross interest payment fee was 20% and I applied it to my current calculation above, the fee increase would be 175%.
    From the email it appears that it applies to new loans taken and so the total fee creep of 175% on all my investments would take 2 more years.

    Harmoney are excited that they have delivered returns above their target so I guess they want to grab some of this lovely lolly for themselves.
    Even after the increase I think my Rar will still be over 11.5%.
    That seems a good way to look at it.
    You seem to have had more repayment/rewrites than me. My principle repayments make up 78% of my payments (I'm about 70% invested in 3 year loans with a RAR of just under 14%). Which leads to a 200% increase in fees for me , from $323 to $975
    Last edited by Finite; 15-05-2016 at 11:54 AM.

  9. #1059
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    153

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Harvey Specter View Post
    So what percentage of interest has the fee been. It sounds like you've been hit by heaps of rewrites if it's that high.

    Fees/interest is about 5% so this will be a 3-4x increase in fees.
    As clearly stated, 17% of the total fees charged was for interest received. i.e. If I paid $100 in total fees P+I, the interest part of the fee was $17.

    So the old system of 1.25% for P+I was much cheaper even with lots of rewrites. There were lots of posts here complaining about the fees charged on rewrites, so I guess we get the new structure as a result.

  10. #1060
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    83

    Default

    time for me to stick my neck out again.

    Heres is another spreadsheet with graphs.

    The fee increase is different depending on when a person rewrites or what loan types they have. It coule be argued that its more advantageous to us now with the lower risk loans as per the attached graphs (at %15 anyway).
    Attached Files Attached Files

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •