CBL is now an absolute sitter for a securities class action - will it happen though, probably not as NZ investors never want to do anything about it.
A major issue rearing it's head - CBL underwrites a large number of contractors bonds and building warranty products in the NZ market. Now those bonds and warranties are effectively useless.
Will this trigger a call on those bonds where contractors have to front up with cash to replace the bond? Cash that the contractors very likely do not have? Will this impact the construction sector?
And how about those home owners that have bought a new house with a now useless building warranty guarantee?
CBL is now an absolute sitter for a securities class action - will it happen though, probably not as NZ investors never want to do anything about it.
A major issue rearing it's head - CBL underwrites a large number of contractors bonds and building warranty products in the NZ market. Now those bonds and warranties are effectively useless.
Will this trigger a call on those bonds where contractors have to front up with cash to replace the bond? Cash that the contractors very likely do not have? Will this impact the construction sector?
And how about those home owners that have bought a new house with a now useless building warranty guarantee?
Was anyone ever charged over the AMI debacle , surely insuring roughly 50 % of all the houses in CHCH was not a good spread of risk hence the failure ?
Was anyone ever charged over the AMI debacle , surely insuring roughly 50 % of all the houses in CHCH was not a good spread of risk hence the failure ?
There have been no charges filed against anyone in respect of the 115 deaths due to negligence and incompetence over the CTV collapse from the Christchurch earthquake.
Why would anyone be charged over a 'trifle' matter like incompetence in managing AMI's overexposure to Christchurch?
Bookmarks