sharetrader
Page 63 of 63 FirstFirst ... 13535960616263
Results 621 to 625 of 625
  1. #621
    Permanent Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,518

    Default

    Means test superannuation? Interesting idea. Interesting and varied views in the article.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/money/350177...ion-commission

    Why invest in the future and the younger generations.

    Do old people provide any return on investment to the country? Does investing in young people provide a return to the nation? I suspect I know where the bigger investment returns are for a nation looking to allocate capital.

    Does capital allocation matter when capital is cheap and readily available.

    A cynical vote grabbing move today by National, pandering to selfish aholes. Why is superannuation not changed along with other benefits, it is over half the welfare spend? (see page 74 Note 8)

    https://www.treasury.govt.nz/sites/d...fsgnz-2023.pdf

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350...anges-benefits
    Last edited by Aaron; 14-02-2024 at 03:21 PM.

  2. #622
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,434

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
    Means test superannuation? Interesting idea. Interesting and varied views in the article.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/money/350177...ion-commission

    Why invest in the future and the younger generations.

    Do old people provide any return on investment to the country? Does investing in young people provide a return to the nation? I suspect I know where the bigger investment returns are for a nation looking to allocate capital.

    Does capital allocation matter when capital is cheap and readily available.

    A cynical vote grabbing move today by National, pandering to selfish aholes. Why is superannuation not changed along with other benefits, it is over half the welfare spend? (see page 74 Note 8)

    https://www.treasury.govt.nz/sites/d...fsgnz-2023.pdf

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350...anges-benefits
    A sensible fella' or fellowess would keep a healthy store under the mattress in case some of these plonkers change the rules so they can keep more of other peoples earnings.
    Last edited by fungus pudding; 15-02-2024 at 08:54 AM. Reason: typo

  3. #623
    Permanent Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fungus pudding View Post
    A sensible felle or fellowess would keep a healthy store under the mattress in case some of these plonkers change the rules so they can keep more of other peoples earnings.
    I suppose if it were only income tested you could buy a bigger house to reduce income and put your hand out for a rates rebate and maybe some sort of accommodation supplement if you are a bludging ahole.

  4. #624
    Permanent Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,518

    Default

    Here is another great idea from government, rather than a capital gains tax and investing in housing and young NZers wanting to get onto the housing ladder, get foreign landlords to build rentals so our young people can rent.

    https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/natio...2619c537&ei=14

    Why is there a housing crisis? Too many f*cking foreigners coming into NZ. Solution get rich foreigners to build houses to rent, keep the property market inflated and boomers happy while young NZers lose all hope of getting ahead.

    What a pack of unpatriotic aholes but sadly they represent the average home owning Kiwi. No surprises if talented young NZers continue to head elsewhere for a better life.

    At least the foreigners may not be just buying existing assets but building new ones.

    I suspect Chris would like the foreign demand to keep house prices high. The building angle is probably to make it more palatable to the average xenophobic NZer (like me) and to assuage concerns about home ownership for those not on high incomes or with family help available.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/money/350179...re-rich-people
    Last edited by Aaron; 15-02-2024 at 08:53 AM.

  5. #625
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    1,071

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
    I suppose if it were only income tested you could buy a bigger house to reduce income and put your hand out for a rates rebate and maybe some sort of accommodation supplement if you are a bludging ahole.
    Yes, fact is they have contributed to fund so its justified. A more balanced super like Ausi is probably fairer being means tested with better tax incentives for people to contribute to thier retirement savings.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •