-
27-06-2016, 04:29 PM
#2381
Well, that's the end of the brexit vote panic. Hopefully everyone enjoyed their black Friday bargain shopping.
I can't wait for the next one... speaking of which, anyone know the date of the Trump vote? Lol
-
27-06-2016, 04:32 PM
#2382
Originally Posted by Bjauck
Surely not voting may actually be an active decision that neither side had convinced you of the merits of their case. It's why in many nations a super majority (eg 60%+ of the turnout and/or a majority of the total electorate) is required to force constitutional change such as that which a Brexit entails. In a non-binding referendum such as this one, if you do vote, you have to expect that whatever you vote for may not eventuate.
Joining the EU didn't require a supermajority Referendum.
-
27-06-2016, 04:35 PM
#2383
Originally Posted by sb9
Couldn't agree more, so in affect 1 vote could've changed the outcome of referendum one way or other. That's how dumb it was!!!
The dumb thing is ever putting such a complex matter to public referendum.
-
27-06-2016, 04:37 PM
#2384
Originally Posted by ratkin
As it turns out the outcome was probably determined by the weather.
That hoary old chestnut gets raised everywhere every election. I dont think there is any merit in it. If its important enough to cast a vote people will. Weather effects every one equally - though you could perhaps argue the elderly / infirm will be less likely to vote. But those issues are mitigated by the availability of postal voting.
-
27-06-2016, 04:42 PM
#2385
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
The dumb thing is ever putting such a complex matter to public referendum.
Meaning the public are not entitled to a say? Precisely the reason why the public had a gutsful of EU bureaucratic nonsense.
-
27-06-2016, 04:48 PM
#2386
Originally Posted by Balance
In which case, democracy says you accept the decision of the majority.
which,in the case of a non-binding referendum, is the majority of parliament.
-
27-06-2016, 04:50 PM
#2387
Half the problem with the British referendum is that clearly the people voting exit were on the whole far less educated than those voting to remain. Makes democracy a tricky affair when the stupid outnumber those that actually have at least a rudimentary grasp of whats at stake.
Should quantity outweigh quality?
thivk.jpg
Last edited by ratkin; 27-06-2016 at 05:09 PM.
-
27-06-2016, 04:50 PM
#2388
Originally Posted by Lego_Man
Joining the EU didn't require a supermajority Referendum.
...no as the decision was the crown-in-parliament's as it inevitably will be this time.
Last edited by Bjauck; 27-06-2016 at 04:53 PM.
-
27-06-2016, 04:50 PM
#2389
Originally Posted by Bjauck
which,in the case of a non-binding referendum, is the majority of parliament.
Yup - if that's what the referedum says - binding or not binding.
-
27-06-2016, 04:55 PM
#2390
Originally Posted by Balance
Meaning the public are not entitled to a say? Precisely the reason why the public had a gutsful of EU bureaucratic nonsense.
The public elect the parliament to vote for a governing cabinet to sort out the difficult stuff in their behalf.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks