The absence of a CGT in NZ is relevant as in effect it is a permanent tax cut. This helps to inflate share prices over time (just as it has helped even more to inflate NZ house prices.) So given this context, I think it makes the performance of the NZX50 gross index less remarkable compared to the performance of the American capital index over the same period.
NZ GST along with US state and local sales taxes, Employer Health and dental insurance payments and payroll tax are not applied as a result of the increased value of share investments when realised.
Smartshares NZ.
I would actually posit that comparing the NZX50 to the S&P500 index is also misleading insofar as the NZX50 is dominated by several large companies. A more valid comparison would be with the NZ portfolio index as followed by the FNZ TOP50 ETF which is "only" up by about 60% in the past five years.
Bookmarks