sharetrader

Thread: AIR - Air NZ.

  1. #18571
    Quiet Observer
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    402

    Default

    Ah yes, correct LaserEye. The plot thickens huh....

    "here goes some more taxpayers money folks", no need to do a CR for now". "By the way, we will write an open letter and gently remind you of your position, remembering that our ideological position is that the national Airline actually should really be owned & controlled by the State anyway"

    Under Labour is re-nationalizing AIR inevitable?
    Success is a journey AND a destination!

  2. #18572
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    123

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaserEyeKiwi View Post
    you all seem to be missing the major good news in todays announcement - interest rate on government loan has been significantly reduced:


    - New lower interest rate of 3.5% (down from 8%) for the first tranche of $1 Billion (increased from $600 million)
    - New lower interest rate of 5% (down from 9%) for the second tranche of $500 million (increased from $300 million)
    The government, given it has access to near infinite funds at ridiculously low rates through RBNZ's bond buying, must be making a tidy profit from gouging AIR NZ, which cannot refuse the loan from its major shareholder. One wonders if this thing is even legal. Surely negatively impacted shareholders would have grounds to file a shareholder lawsuit against the company for breach of fiduciary duty?

  3. #18573
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kyanar View Post
    The government, given it has access to near infinite funds at ridiculously low rates through RBNZ's bond buying, must be making a tidy profit from gouging AIR NZ, which cannot refuse the loan from its major shareholder. One wonders if this thing is even legal. Surely negatively impacted shareholders would have grounds to file a shareholder lawsuit against the company for breach of fiduciary duty?
    taken one from buffets playbook on giving loans to distressed companies at very high rates
    one step ahead of the herd

  4. #18574
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kyanar View Post
    The government, given it has access to near infinite funds at ridiculously low rates through RBNZ's bond buying, must be making a tidy profit from gouging AIR NZ, which cannot refuse the loan from its major shareholder. One wonders if this thing is even legal. Surely negatively impacted shareholders would have grounds to file a shareholder lawsuit against the company for breach of fiduciary duty?
    All negotiated on an arms’ length basis and each party has been independently advised so all above board

    Distressed companies always ‘pay’ top dollar (high interest rates) to stay afloat - and generally not in a good negotiating position.

    Shareholders still have a company ....lucky aren’t they - they could have lost the lot without a bail out.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  5. #18575
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    In Exile
    Posts
    337

    Default

    The assumption implicit in the government loan is that AIR could not raise the money elsewhere without paying higher interest rates or agreeing to more problematic covenants (especially debt servicing). If my assumption is correct, I don't have a problem with taking the loan on the terms they did. Other airlines have done similar deals and it's worth bearing in mind that if customers worry about an airline's financial ability to keep flying they won't part with their hard earned and heavily taxed cash.

    That said, the blunt reality is I find it hard to see a way out of their current position without a significant capital raise unless the government opens the border to quarantine free travellers from other low risk countries such as Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong and does so very promptly (which I consider unlikely). Even that probably wouldn't be enough.

    Disclosure: wouldn't touch it with a barge pole long enough to pole vault Cook Strait.

  6. #18576
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    landskrona sweden
    Posts
    4,308

    Default

    Certainly which shareholders would precede with a case against the Air Line as the GOVT holds such a large percentage.

    who has the money to bring the case.

    This situation is very very good for the tax payer and hopeless for traders.

    Pitty as it would be a buy after the cap raise and surely a good bit of price discovery.

    The government could keep this going for a while, perhaps years.

    The dividend when it comes will be far reduced because the leveraged balance sheet to the government.

    The govt hold the largest portion of share and could hold the largest portion of debt? Havnt run the numbers , some for Inspector Snoop to go over.

    Govt loan repayments are from cap raise but that is surely just give the message that they want you to invest.

    Roll out the WW1 add, Your Country Needs you buy AIR Cap Raise.
    Last edited by Waltzing; 09-04-2021 at 03:22 PM.

  7. #18577
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    886

    Default

    Air NZ expects the Tasman to return to 80-90% of pre-COVID capacity. That will be enough for the airline to breakeven on a cash basis. If it goes to 150% of capacity as it easily could with no Virgin/Emirates/Others etc then expect the airline to be solidly profitable. Tasman fliers will also take domestic flights so expect domestic load factors to increase too. Also a bit more capacity for international arrivals.

    Reduced more realistic interest rates help too and the air freight support scheme has been extended to October.

    Looks like their plan of playing for time is working out well. Well done to management.
    Last edited by Jaa; 09-04-2021 at 03:57 PM.

  8. #18578
    ... have power to make you great
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Far North
    Posts
    1,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rawz View Post
    Why would anyone own this share at these prices? Am I missing something?
    Its funny, Morningstar have AIR as undervalued along with ATM

  9. #18579
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaa View Post
    Air NZ expects the Tasman to return to 80-90% of pre-COVID capacity. That will be enough for the airline to breakeven on a cash basis. If it goes to 150% of capacity as it easily could with no Virgin/Emirates/Others etc then expect the airline to be solidly profitable. Tasman fliers will also take domestic flights so expect domestic load factors to increase too. Also a bit more capacity for international arrivals.
    That would also depend on how many times the tap is turned off due to an outbreak in one of the bubble countries/states. I think their projections are overly optimistic at this point, unless the projection horizon is a single day.
    Last edited by Zaphod; 10-04-2021 at 09:52 AM.

  10. #18580
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    597

    Default

    Fran O'Sullivan: Grant Robertson tightens Government's grip on Air New Zealand
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/...ectid=12434610
    Again this is premium. But I've never owned Air as Ive always thought as overpriced and a tip I was once told was never own a airline.
    But this kinda tells me the government want them to sacrifice profit for the good of the country. I don't see how air nz can proceed as overly profitable with the government putting there claws in

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •