-
16-10-2015, 01:19 PM
#3641
Just back from a trip to Europe. Used Air NZ and star alliance partners Virgin Atlantic, BA, Air Canada, and Portugese National Carrier (whose name escapes me)
For what it's worth, my impressions..
Overall I didn't think the Air NZ Service and Product particularly stood out. I'd say adequate rather than exceptional - the new Lounge at Tom Bradley in LA is very nice, although it is a star alliance lounge rather than an Air NZ one. All of the Air NZ long haul flights seemed to be full as far as I could see, although was a bit disappointed that the LA to Auckland sector NZ5 was still operating on a 777-200 rather than 300 and the plane seemed pretty tired fitout wise, the entertainment system was out of the arc when compared with the 777-300 ones
Anyway, I'm still holding and very pleased with the share price and dividends that are flowing - just think that AIR needs to lift its game a bit if it wants to continue to charge premium fares.
-
16-10-2015, 01:41 PM
#3642
Originally Posted by Poet
Just back from a trip to Europe. Used Air NZ and star alliance partners Virgin Atlantic, BA, Air Canada, and Portugese National Carrier (whose name escapes me)
For what it's worth, my impressions..
Overall I didn't think the Air NZ Service and Product particularly stood out. I'd say adequate rather than exceptional - the new Lounge at Tom Bradley in LA is very nice, although it is a star alliance lounge rather than an Air NZ one. All of the Air NZ long haul flights seemed to be full as far as I could see, although was a bit disappointed that the LA to Auckland sector NZ5 was still operating on a 777-200 rather than 300 and the plane seemed pretty tired fitout wise, the entertainment system was out of the arc when compared with the 777-300 ones
Anyway, I'm still holding and very pleased with the share price and dividends that are flowing - just think that AIR needs to lift its game a bit if it wants to continue to charge premium fares.
Poet, comments almost mirror my recent experiences
Had fun on a dinger of a 777-200. Creaky old hing and entertainment system slightly munted but best bit was pissing of the guy next to me when my overhead light brightly lit up his seat and left me in the dark. Did it a few times.
Shareholders shouldn't worry. AIR doing a good job in squeezing every dollar out of every passenger with a careful balance between customer experience and cost efficiencies.
It's all about perception ....perception AIR brillant and better than most, reality not te case.
But as long as the hye and marketing does its thing shareholders will be duly rewarded
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
16-10-2015, 01:55 PM
#3643
I think you guys were a little unlucky getting some of the last flights on the 777-200's before they're refurbished. C.L. mentioned at the recent annual meeting that the refurbishment programme on those planes would be complete by December 2015. All planes across the international fleet are being fitted out to the current modern standard so the customer has a consistent quality experience. Notice I didn't say a gold standard experience as really ten abreast on a 777 is a pretty tight fit in terms of shoulder space. The seating has been designed for optimum efficiency and a reasonable standard of comfort. The accountant and shareholder in me is very pleased with how efficiently they're kitting out their planes.
Unfortunately the tighter seating standards are becoming the norm right across the industry. Best you can hope for is the bigger windows, lower cabin altitude and fancy lighting of the new Dreamliner to give the illusion of space and comfort or ante-up for business class.
Last edited by Beagle; 16-10-2015 at 01:56 PM.
-
16-10-2015, 03:56 PM
#3644
Member
[QUOTE=Roger;594343]No argument from me mate. I'm on record with the (outrageous as it may sound) prediction that AIR is a $5+ stock in a few years and with gross divvies incl special(s) we're being paid extremely handsomely to wait.
Doesn't sound outrageous to me Roger. It has nearly tripled in value in the last 3 years and its medium term future looks fantastic.
-
16-10-2015, 05:53 PM
#3645
Originally Posted by freddagg
Doesn't sound outrageous to me Roger. It has nearly tripled in value in the last 3 years and its medium term future looks fantastic.
Well said mate.
-
16-10-2015, 07:02 PM
#3646
Originally Posted by Roger
I think you guys were a little unlucky getting some of the last flights on the 777-200's before they're refurbished. C.L. mentioned at the recent annual meeting that the refurbishment programme on those planes would be complete by December 2015. All planes across the international fleet are being fitted out to the current modern standard so the customer has a consistent quality experience. Notice I didn't say a gold standard experience as really ten abreast on a 777 is a pretty tight fit in terms of shoulder space. The seating has been designed for optimum efficiency and a reasonable standard of comfort. The accountant and shareholder in me is very pleased with how efficiently they're kitting out their planes.
Unfortunately the tighter seating standards are becoming the norm right across the industry. Best you can hope for is the bigger windows, lower cabin altitude and fancy lighting of the new Dreamliner to give the illusion of space and comfort or ante-up for business class.
Can only repeat my experience of a few months ago..
Outward to Tokyo.. Less than half full
Inward a month later .. Approx half full..
Great service.. Two different aircraft..
With more competition on the horizon..
Not convinced ..
Disc. Not a holder..
-
16-10-2015, 09:57 PM
#3647
-
17-10-2015, 11:19 AM
#3648
Originally Posted by Roger
I think you guys were a little unlucky getting some of the last flights on the 777-200's before they're refurbished. C.L. mentioned at the recent annual meeting that the refurbishment programme on those planes would be complete by December 2015. All planes across the international fleet are being fitted out to the current modern standard so the customer has a consistent quality experience. Notice I didn't say a gold standard experience as really ten abreast on a 777 is a pretty tight fit in terms of shoulder space. The seating has been designed for optimum efficiency and a reasonable standard of comfort. The accountant and shareholder in me is very pleased with how efficiently they're kitting out their planes.
Unfortunately the tighter seating standards are becoming the norm right across the industry. Best you can hope for is the bigger windows, lower cabin altitude and fancy lighting of the new Dream liner to give the illusion of space and comfort or ante-up for business class.
Certainly cant disagree with their SP rise --but disagree with your seating standards comments --Some are providing roomier layouts and far more comfort--With all due respect ,if they rely to much on their accountants,it could come back to bite them in the future--who wants to fly in a cramped plane while still paying big money if they dont have to?---Who would have thought MAL would beat Air NZ hands down for comfort (service was fine as well) They have obviously managed to get the cash flowing and share holders are definitely benefiting,but lets not fool ourselves that their comfort and service is par with some of the better airlines(still think cramming so many seats on the dream liners is a bit cheapskate and may catch up to them.
(I wouldnt worry about looking bad compared to the American airlines though--lousy)
Disc-Ive found alot of flights in general are pretty full--I think its a good time for airlines in general ATM
Last edited by skid; 17-10-2015 at 11:28 AM.
-
17-10-2015, 11:57 AM
#3649
When I flew London to Hong Kong on virgin Dreamliner a passenger who was a 'know all' on all things aviation said that virgin used to fly 316 passengers in a a340-600 on this route but the Dreamliner only carries 264.
Quite a drop in capacity for one of their milk run routes
does AIR have reduced capacity on the routes they are now using Dreamliners?
I see AIR squeeze 300 plus on to a Dreamliner - accountants at work?
Dreamliner over hyped in my opinion. Didn't seem much more comfortable than any other plans (the AIR dungers excepted) and hate the artificial night time thing when its 3pm outside. Suppose keep the passengers asleep they require less attention.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
17-10-2015, 12:00 PM
#3650
That know all also told me that Virgin Atlantic have one of the lowest toilets to passengers ratio
Their accountants are better
See you learn something every day
Last edited by winner69; 17-10-2015 at 12:05 PM.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks