sharetrader
Page 10 of 14 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 133
  1. #91
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    For me I'd Be happy to double the royalty no prob.
    Good on you for being prepared to put your money where your mouth is. Your $1 contribution would go some way but not a long way

  2. #92
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    For me I'd Be happy to double the royalty no prob.
    How do you propose that the tax on dairy irrigation is levied?

  3. #93
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,742

    Default

    I would not have the slightest clue. Fartherist away area of expertise i could imagine. There are experts for that sort of thing to work out a royalty for the use of water. maybe that makes it easier too. For the "use" of water not for the water .

  4. #94
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,436

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    I would not have the slightest clue. Fartherist away area of expertise i could imagine. There are experts for that sort of thing to work out a royalty for the use of water. maybe that makes it easier too. For the "use" of water not for the water .
    For us mere humans, what on earth is a fartherist?

  5. #95
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    I would not have the slightest clue. Fartherist away area of expertise i could imagine. There are experts for that sort of thing to work out a royalty for the use of water. maybe that makes it easier too. For the "use" of water not for the water .
    Yeah but how are you going to measure usage? I do not think Jacinda has even thought about this.

  6. #96
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    Yeah but how are you going to measure usage? I do not think Jacinda has even thought about this.
    for a start it should be water that hits the ground from the irrigator - because that is the stuff that will eventually flow into poluted river.

    It cant include the water that leaves the pivot sprinkler as some will be lost to evapouration before hitting the ground.

  7. #97
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minimoke View Post
    for a start it should be water that hits the ground from the irrigator - because that is the stuff that will eventually flow into poluted river.

    It cant include the water that leaves the pivot sprinkler as some will be lost to evapouration before hitting the ground.
    And even then... how do you measure that? Will it be farmers volunteering this information or will irrigators have meters on them? Who will collect this metered data?

  8. #98
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    964

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    And even then... how do you measure that? Will it be farmers volunteering this information or will irrigators have meters on them? Who will collect this metered data?
    They have to measure their consumption now in Canterbury anyway. otherwise how do you check they are not exceeding their allocation?
    Farmers are all honest of course but I am old enough to remember a sheep retention scheme where NZ s flock increased massively overnight.

    westerly

  9. #99
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    How do you propose that the tax on dairy irrigation is levied?
    Easy

    Individual region pollution remediation cost / litres irrigated in the region X litres irrigated on the individual farm = individual farm irrigation tax. Spread tax bill equally over a number of years eg 20 years. The tax is levied on the farm, not the owner

    But should also apply to non-irrigated farms because they are also very polluting

    In non-irrigated areas it should be ratio'ed on head count and animal type

    And all industries should make a contribution as well, based on effluent BOD or COD, suspended solids, toxic trace metals

  10. #100
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,984

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xafalcon View Post
    Easy

    Individual region pollution remediation cost / litres irrigated in the region X litres irrigated on the individual farm = individual farm irrigation tax. Spread tax bill equally over a number of years eg 20 years. The tax is levied on the farm, not the owner

    But should also apply to non-irrigated farms because they are also very polluting

    In non-irrigated areas it should be ratio'ed on head count and animal type

    And all industries should make a contribution as well, based on effluent BOD or COD, suspended solids, toxic trace metals
    That, however, is not a water tax. It is a livestock tax in the context of farmers.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •