-
Junior Member
Not sure how you compare these two. Sir Bill was an affable good guy who certainly didn't have evil intent. More harmless than lightweight. Ardern is in a completely different category. I will leave it there.
-
TBF, he looked like he'd turned up unarmed, to a battle of wits.
-
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
Let me guess. Did you not like her?
These days you can be crucified if found to have called (Saint) JA an ‘IQ lightweight’ some years ago, but Te Pati claiming that Maori are genetically superior is met with a yawn. Strange times we are living through.
-
Originally Posted by Logen Ninefingers
These days you can be crucified if found to have called (Saint) JA an ‘IQ lightweight’ some years ago, but Te Pati claiming that Maori are genetically superior is met with a yawn. Strange times we are living through.
And yet Ardern ran rings around her opposites in the debating chamber. She consistantly made Bridges, Collins, Muller & Luxon look like fools in question time.
Love or hate Ardern she was no intellectual lightweight as some scum peddlers on here espouse.
She also led a world leading response to the pandemic again despite what the conspiracy reabbit warren dwellers want you to think. If National had been in power under their leadership at the time it would have been a complete disaster and many more people would have lost their lives.
I find it amasing six months after she has left office, which I agree needed to happen as she couldn't get out of crisis mode, that the ferals are still harping on about her.
It's a pity people can't criticise whilst showing due respect. This ugly character assassination and in Ardern's case its obvious misogyny, as she has copped it far more than anyone else, says more about the poster than the subject.
-
Originally Posted by Daytr
And yet Ardern ran rings around her opposites in the debating chamber. She consistantly made Bridges, Collins, Muller & Luxon look like fools in question time.
Love or hate Ardern she was no intellectual lightweight as some scum peddlers on here espouse.
She also led a world leading response to the pandemic again despite what the conspiracy reabbit warren dwellers want you to think. If National had been in power under their leadership at the time it would have been a complete disaster and many more people would have lost their lives.
I find it amasing six months after she has left office, which I agree needed to happen as she couldn't get out of crisis mode, that the ferals are still harping on about her.
It's a pity people can't criticise whilst showing due respect. This ugly character assassination and in Ardern's case its obvious misogyny, as she has copped it far more than anyone else, says more about the poster than the subject.
Ardern is a lightweight. No more than an oppourtunist who acted well beyond her mandates. Dangerous is a description she well deserves.
-
Originally Posted by Daytr
And yet Ardern ran rings around her opposites in the debating chamber. She consistantly made Bridges, Collins, Muller & Luxon look like fools in question time.
Love or hate Ardern she was no intellectual lightweight as some scum peddlers on here espouse.
She also led a world leading response to the pandemic again despite what the conspiracy reabbit warren dwellers want you to think. If National had been in power under their leadership at the time it would have been a complete disaster and many more people would have lost their lives.
I find it amasing six months after she has left office, which I agree needed to happen as she couldn't get out of crisis mode, that the ferals are still harping on about her.
It's a pity people can't criticise whilst showing due respect. This ugly character assassination and in Ardern's case its obvious misogyny, as she has copped it far more than anyone else, says more about the poster than the subject.
She ran rings around the nation with lies and misinformation. She was a terrible PM as she herself realised and did a runner and her "world leading response to the pandemic" was madness that we are paying for dearly at the moment. It achieved absolutely nothing other than misery after the first year or so.
-
Originally Posted by Daytr
And yet Ardern ran rings around her opposites in the debating chamber. She consistantly made Bridges, Collins, Muller & Luxon look like fools in question time.
Love or hate Ardern she was no intellectual lightweight as some scum peddlers on here espouse.
She also led a world leading response to the pandemic again despite what the conspiracy reabbit warren dwellers want you to think. If National had been in power under their leadership at the time it would have been a complete disaster and many more people would have lost their lives.
I find it amasing six months after she has left office, which I agree needed to happen as she couldn't get out of crisis mode, that the ferals are still harping on about her.
It's a pity people can't criticise whilst showing due respect. This ugly character assassination and in Ardern's case its obvious misogyny, as she has copped it far more than anyone else, says more about the poster than the subject.
Nah, calling someone an ‘IQ lightweight’ is pretty mild, and a handful of people would have read the comment when it was posted. Trust a lefty like you to start shrieking about ‘misogyny’.
-
Originally Posted by ynot
Ardern is a lightweight. No more than an oppourtunist who acted well beyond her mandates. Dangerous is a description she well deserves.
Originally Posted by iceman
She ran rings around the nation with lies and misinformation. She was a terrible PM as she herself realised and did a runner and her "world leading response to the pandemic" was madness that we are paying for dearly at the moment. It achieved absolutely nothing other than misery after the first year or so.
As expected the rabbit warren dwellers have been triggered.
-
Originally Posted by Daytr
As expected the rabbit warren dwellers have been triggered.
Daytr - once an arsehole Labour shill, always an arsehole.
-
Originally Posted by fizzletop
Due respect is earned. Ardern did not earn it. Whilst she was good at communicating and spin, she was a completely ineffectual PM. Calling her a lightweight is being generous.
So you don't think she managed the pandemic well? The rest of the world look at us with envy.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks