So buy for $500k
Over the next 2 yrs add $200k improvements (new kitchen, bathroom etc (rather than new rooms))
10 yrs later sell for $1.2mil
Pay tax on $700k
Purchase new house similar to old for $1.2mil because housing inflation has grown the cost.
Not only has the housing inflation been taxed but so have the improvements you paid for.
Simple solution -- add the improvements to the purchase price.
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
You must spend each and every day looking for obstacles. Quik-stik labels are cheap and easy to advise any GST change. All taxes hit the consumer. What's your next problem?
Plus the staff wages, opportunity cost and wasted time for whoever has to do this.
Carpet?
Painted the walls?
New vanity?
All stuff done over the 20 years you owned the place - receipts kept?
Simple!
Exactly! Not many owner occupiers keep those records, and seldom for the duration of ownership anyway. Of course they would need to differentiate between maintenance and improvements. IRD has a simple method LOL!
However, unlikely any CGT would be retrospective so there would be time to set up a large fireproof safe to keep the records in for the next 20 years.
Physical stores will have to change all their price labels which is a direct cost to them.
Plus it's a revenue tax and will hit businesses when we don't need that, but rather to obtain something from the currently untaxed parts of the economy.
The calculation is simple and would not be retrospective:
(Sale price - purchase price) * tax
You must spend each and every day looking for obstacles. Quik-stik labels are cheap and easy to advise any GST change. All taxes hit the consumer. What's your next problem?
A common estimate of the black / grey economy is $20 billion a year. That is a lot of income tax not paid that can be partly or mostly offset by a GST increase. In the past there has been an adjustment to income tax to achieve neutrality with a GST increase. An opportunity to reset thresholds.
Parties tax policies? Greens and ACT have published theirs.
That's quite mean.. we live in a country of free speech. feel free to address the substance
Back on topic the most recent Nat leader seems to be rather old upon taking office. Medical records should be reviewed once you are near the superannuation age IMO.
Unfortunately National lost recently a lot of good people (true, a lot of bad people as well, but this is another story). Instead of trying to keep and grow good people they now throw money at getting facebook likes for the bad ones. I doubt this will work.
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
Unfortunately National lost recently a lot of good people (true, a lot of bad people as well, but this is another story). Instead of trying to keep and grow good people they now throw money at getting facebook likes for the bad ones. I doubt this will work.[/QUOTE
Admittedly national are down on firepower but compared to Labours talent of about 3 or maybe 4 with half a brain, no contest.
Bookmarks