-
20-08-2020, 08:50 PM
#1231
Originally Posted by Bjauck
If you toughen up the rental property requirements, some landlords will decide that it is not worth providing rental accommodation. Unless you want increased homelessness for those less than perfect tenants, the government has to provide more state or social housing. National has said to will turn back some of the reforms so presumably fewer landlords would then leave the market.
That makes no sense - if I am a landlord and sell a house the house doesn't vanish as someone still lives in it with a new owner!
-
20-08-2020, 08:52 PM
#1232
Originally Posted by dobby41
When that Landlord sells they will either sell to someone who will live in it or rent it.
If they sell to someone to live in it themselves then they won't need to rent - the rental demand just went down.
The houses don't vanish.
Good call I just posted something similar after I read your post!
-
20-08-2020, 09:26 PM
#1233
Originally Posted by tim23
Good call I just posted something similar after I read your post!
There is plenty of data to suggest that owner occupied dwellings have less people in them than dwellings that are rented. Hope you can comprehend the implications thereof.
-
20-08-2020, 09:27 PM
#1234
Originally Posted by tim23
That makes no sense - if I am a landlord and sell a house the house doesn't vanish as someone still lives in it with a new owner!
We are in the process of purchasing what is currently a crappy rental in another part of the country. But once we have purchased it we are not planning to rent it out. In fact it will remain vacant for a year possibly (the cost of holding assets is pretty much nil now with these interest rates) and do it up when we have the time to go and visit.
-
21-08-2020, 06:50 AM
#1235
Originally Posted by tim23
That makes no sense - if I am a landlord and sell a house the house doesn't vanish as someone still lives in it with a new owner!
When the government introduces rental regulation changes that increases compliance costs for landlords and tenancy security for tenants, some landlords will decide to sell up.
Sure, some of the houses may well be sold to former tenants or to those who remained at home with parents - probably many of the purchasers would have been former better-than-average tenants? However as has already been said, in the absence of an increase in house building the remaining tenants will probably face further overcrowding problems.
Of course these tenancy reforms come with a cost. Only part of that cost (for example decreased profitability, fewer capital gains) will be borne by the landlords. The rest of the cost will be borne by society either by having to provide social housing or by picking up the social costs in other ways as increased overcrowding or homelessness take their tolls.
If you think the rental reforms are worth it, then you should also expect to pay for them in one way or another.
Last edited by Bjauck; 21-08-2020 at 06:57 AM.
-
21-08-2020, 07:21 AM
#1236
Originally Posted by Bjauck
When the government introduces rental regulation changes that increases compliance costs for landlords and tenancy security for tenants, some landlords will decide to sell up. ...
Good post, and not just because I agree with it!
An additional factor in landlord decisions is hassle - another cost that is part financial but part is just hassle thus extra work and stress.
Sure there are hassles for tenants as well, especially when tenancies are terminated and they need to find somewhere else to live, or dealing with dodgy landlords.
The hassle factor is worst for landlords with 1 or 2 rentals - that's 80% of them. The point is - they have options.
-
21-08-2020, 09:17 AM
#1237
Originally Posted by blackcap
We are in the process of purchasing what is currently a crappy rental in another part of the country. But once we have purchased it we are not planning to rent it out. In fact it will remain vacant for a year possibly (the cost of holding assets is pretty much nil now with these interest rates) and do it up when we have the time to go and visit.
From memory it was estimated there may have been 27-30,000 empty houses in Auckland prior to the last election. We had and continue to have policy issues around CGT, accommodation supplements etc....not shortage of housing stock.
-
21-08-2020, 09:20 AM
#1238
Originally Posted by blackcap
We are in the process of purchasing what is currently a crappy rental in another part of the country. But once we have purchased it we are not planning to rent it out. In fact it will remain vacant for a year possibly (the cost of holding assets is pretty much nil now with these interest rates) and do it up when we have the time to go and visit.
Why wouldn't you wait if you don't want to use it now? It will be cheaper when interest rates rise.
-
21-08-2020, 09:54 AM
#1239
Originally Posted by jonu
From memory it was estimated there may have been 27-30,000 empty houses in Auckland prior to the last election. We had and continue to have policy issues around CGT, accommodation supplements etc....not shortage of housing stock.
Number of vacant Auckland dwellings were published as part of the last census, and was a bigger number than yours but similar to previous census counts. There was a fair bit of discussion about definitions at the time. Turned out that the national count was a pretty blunt instrument as it counted all sorts of empty places including holiday homes, occupants on holiday, renovations, waiting for new tenants or buyers to move in.
Even if there is not a shortage some prospective tenants are never going to find a private rental unless the landlord is a charity or not very sensible.
-
21-08-2020, 09:55 AM
#1240
Originally Posted by jonu
From memory it was estimated there may have been 27-30,000 empty houses in Auckland prior to the last election. We had and continue to have policy issues around CGT, accommodation supplements etc....not shortage of housing stock.
That is a good point. There is a newly completed housing development near where I live in Auckland. As far as I am aware all the houses have been sold. Yet when driving around it seems that many are unoccupied. Some may be waiting for new occupants, but probably some are closed up as owners remain out-of-town, abroad or being kept as an investment without the hassle of having tenants.
With rental reforms, the number of empty houses could increase. If this is undesirable, there would need to be other tax and other reforms or levies.
Auckland may have more "ghost houses" than London
https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/h...nto-the-market
Last edited by Bjauck; 21-08-2020 at 09:57 AM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks