sharetrader
Page 127 of 505 FirstFirst ... 2777117123124125126127128129130131137177227 ... LastLast
Results 1,261 to 1,270 of 5048

Thread: National - FFS!

  1. #1261
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjauck View Post
    National have never liked KiwiSaver. They would prefer the wealthier to continue to treat our expensive residential housing as their pension schemes, enjoying minimal taxable income and untaxed leveraged capital gains.
    What evidence do you have that National don't like KiwiSaver?

    On your other point, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it Labour that allowed KiwiSaver retirement funds to be used to purchase residential housing?
    Last edited by Zaphod; 29-08-2020 at 12:03 PM.

  2. #1262
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaphod View Post
    What evidence do you have that National don't like KiwiSaver?

    On your other point, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it Labour that allowed KiwiSaver retirement funds to be used to purchase residential housing?
    National voted against the KiwiSaver Bill. Then Key claimed they did not support because it had few incentives. Yet when in power he actually reduced the $1000 joining incentive plus reduced the annual credit by half! Now they want it to be used to fund the business start-ups of those who become unemployed.

    The First home Withdrawal (which incidentally I disagree with) is allowed to purchase an owner-occupied first home - it is not to buy investor residential housing in addition to any owner-occupied main dwelling. That investor housing seems to be the National Party preferred pension scheme for those who can afford it.

    However both labour and national have done little to reduce the comparative appeal of residential real estate as pension scheme - although National even less than Labour.
    Last edited by Bjauck; 29-08-2020 at 01:22 PM.

  3. #1263
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjauck View Post
    National voted against the KiwiSaver Bill. Then Key claimed they did not support because it had few incentives. Yet when in power he actually reduced the $1000 joining incentive plus reduced the annual credit by half! Now they want it to be used to fund the business start-ups of those who become unemployed.
    National weren't opposing KiwiSaver, they were voting against the reform package as it stood. Reducing government subsidies was also what Cullen proposed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjauck View Post
    The First home Withdrawal (which incidentally I disagree with) is allowed to purchase an owner-occupied first home - it is not to buy investor residential housing in addition to any owner-occupied main dwelling. That investor housing seems to be the National Party preferred pension scheme for those who can afford it.

    However both labour and national have done little to reduce the comparative appeal of residential real estate as pension scheme - although National even less than Labour.
    The Kiwi way of saving for retirement is to purchase a family home to do up, flick then repeat. Our neighbours are doing just that right now, and this is their 5th home in 9 or so years. They used Kiwisaver to buy their first investment home. Using the fund to start a business, given the current circumstances, does not challenge the precedent already set.

    For the record, I too disagree with using Kiwisaver for both of these purpose.

  4. #1264
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    3,330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Look at how the '4 legs good, 2 legs better' brigade is avoiding the other thread Labour/NZ First Government like the plague to avoid the awkward questions posed by jonu?
    Missed that, being away around the country again on holiday.

  5. #1265
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaphod View Post
    National weren't opposing KiwiSaver, they were voting against the reform package as it stood. Reducing government subsidies was also what Cullen proposed.



    The Kiwi way of saving for retirement is to purchase a family home to do up, flick then repeat. Our neighbours are doing just that right now, and this is their 5th home in 9 or so years. They used Kiwisaver to buy their first investment home. Using the fund to start a business, given the current circumstances, does not challenge the precedent already set.

    For the record, I too disagree with using Kiwisaver for both of these purpose.
    No the kiwi way was to buy a home after marriage, do it up, make it home for the family to grow up in. Then maybe for those who could afford they would buy a rental. However I agree that many do now flip homes every few years as they get the best leveraged returns - largely untaxed apart from needing to pay rates. So yep over capitalising the family home becomes the pension scheme. Consequently the family home (increasingly affordable by only a minority) amd investor residential property should have the same burden of tax as a percentage of gains as KiwiSaver. Home ownership is being subsidised by other tax payers.
    Last edited by Bjauck; 29-08-2020 at 04:29 PM.

  6. #1266
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjauck View Post
    No the kiwi way was to buy a home after marriage, do it up, make it home for the family to grow up in. Then maybe for those who could afford they would buy a rental. However I agree that many do now flip homes every few years as they get the best leveraged returns - largely untaxed apart from needing to pay rates. So yep over capitalising the family home becomes the pension scheme. Consequently the family home (increasingly affordable by only a minority) amd investor residential property should have the same burden of tax as a percentage of gains as KiwiSaver. Home ownership is being subsidised by other tax payers.
    I think the key word in this is "was". Certainly for my generation and those subsequent, the road to riches is to buy a house, do it up, flick it on. Only a very few of my peers are into purchasing property to turn into residential rentals, which I can completely understand.

    From what you've written I assume you'd advocate for a CGT (or something similar, if implemented) to apply to the family home?

  7. #1267
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaphod View Post
    I think the key word in this is "was". Certainly for my generation and those subsequent, the road to riches is to buy a house, do it up, flick it on. Only a very few of my peers are into purchasing property to turn into residential rentals, which I can completely understand.

    From what you've written I assume you'd advocate for a CGT (or something similar, if implemented) to apply to the family home?
    Yep. Along with taxable Imputed net rent - in conjunction with a decent CGT threshold and income tax Threshold before tax would be levied. However that would not be possible politically at this stage. So instead, I would advocate that KiwiSaver should at least receive the same tax leniency as owner-occupied housing.

  8. #1268
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,188

    Default

    Labour support drops in August but still maintains huge lead of 19.5% over National

    https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/8...0-202008310343

    Must be another rouge poll no doubt .....

  9. #1269
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    3,330

    Default

    A veteran red-zone activist says if the government overseeing Christchurch’s quake response was managing the coronavirus pandemic “we’d have … 3000 or 4000 elderly folk dead”.
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/ne...o-transparency

    This is the city that Gerry tried to build.

  10. #1270
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dobby41 View Post
    A veteran red-zone activist says if the government overseeing Christchurch’s quake response was managing the coronavirus pandemic “we’d have … 3000 or 4000 elderly folk dead”.
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/ne...o-transparency

    This is the city that Gerry tried to build.
    Yawn - activist who wanted taxpayers to pay for the uninsured to be fully compensated and get new houses built for them.

    Must be getting desperate to post such an article. Yawn.
    Last edited by Balance; 02-09-2020 at 09:41 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •