sharetrader
Page 142 of 505 FirstFirst ... 4292132138139140141142143144145146152192242 ... LastLast
Results 1,411 to 1,420 of 5048

Thread: National - FFS!

  1. #1411
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RupertBear View Post
    WOW getting satisfaction out of bullying someone for his off the cuff comment! Sick! Tim23 comes across as a pretty decent chap to me, you on the other hand come across as a complete jerk. I hope Tim23 puts you on ignore where you belong.
    Off the cuff? On the contrary, RB but your comments are to be expected - birds of a feather flock together.

  2. #1412
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dobby41 View Post
    So when it leaks, and it will, how pays the cost?
    The private outfit says 'oops, sorry' and the Govt (us) still pay the cost?

    Brownlee, when asked about the scheme, kept harping on that the current scheme was already private. He seemed to imply there was little change but there was a big, game changing, change.
    Just like when the current "govt" scheme leaks who pays? Yeah the government. So its a great idea. Build in some KPI's with targets. If it leaks there are penalties. That should deter leaks. Unlike the current government run scheme when there are leaks there are no penalties and no one is held to account.

    Just like corrections really. Serco was held to account and the media were all over their indiscretions but when the same sort of stuff happens at Rimutaka or a govt run premise... crickets.

  3. #1413
    Aspiring to be an Awesome Bear
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    In the Woods
    Posts
    1,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Off the cuff? On the contrary, RB but your comments are to be expected - birds of a feather flock together.
    Not sure why you lump me into the birds of a feather category for calling out your bullying behaviour You know NOTHING about me, we on the other hand have a pretty good idea of the kind of person you are and its not kind

  4. #1414
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RupertBear View Post
    Not sure why you lump me into the birds of a feather category for calling out your bullying behaviour You know NOTHING about me, we on the other hand have a pretty good idea of the kind of person you are and its not kind

    Tim23 made repeated comments which I am happy to call him out on with a bet. The rest of you Labourites gang up and attempt as per usual to deflect and spin your way out - 'Birds of a Feather'.

    Where's the bullying? Calling somebody out with a bet is bullying?

    You should be encouraging him to be a man, take the bet or apologize. It's that simple, RB - but like Cindy, who is back to wearing the hijab today to support the oppression of Muslim women in certain countries, it's all spin, bluff and bluster with you lot.
    Last edited by Balance; 24-09-2020 at 01:16 PM.

  5. #1415
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    3,330

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    Just like when the current "govt" scheme leaks who pays? Yeah the government. So its a great idea. Build in some KPI's with targets. If it leaks there are penalties. That should deter leaks. Unlike the current government run scheme when there are leaks there are no penalties and no one is held to account.

    Just like corrections really. Serco was held to account and the media were all over their indiscretions but when the same sort of stuff happens at Rimutaka or a govt run premise... crickets.
    So if the Govt screws up they (we) pay.
    If private enterprise screws up the Govt (we) pay.
    I can imagine some lodge getting, and paying, a multi $100mil bill for a lockdown - not!
    Serco is a good example - set all the standards you like but issues still happen.
    The impact of an issue at the prison is quite different to an Isolation issue.

  6. #1416
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,701

    Default

    The term bullying is like the term racist these days. Both are formed in the eye and opinion of the speaker. Designed not to inform or educate but to shut down the person on the receiving end. So prevalent now that the term cancel culture has been coined and is gaining currency fast.

    Heh, I just googled it 5.5 million hits. Tell me that doesn't indicate something.

  7. #1417
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    3,744

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Tim23 made repeated comments which I am happy to call him out on with a bet. The rest of you Labourites gang up and attempt as per usual to deflect and spin your way out - 'Birds of a Feather'.

    Where's the bullying? Calling somebody out with a bet is bullying?

    You should be encouraging him to be a man, take the bet or apologize. It's that simple, RB - but like Cindy, who is back to wearing the hijab today to support the oppression of Muslim women in certain countries, it's all spin, bluff and bluster with you lot.

    Considering your last stance(s) on mental health when the lockdowns were announced , you should have more respect and allow people to have good mental health when reading your posts rather than berating them and using cheap terms like "cindy" and "team of incompetents".

    repeating something doesn't make something any more useful or truthful.
    Last edited by Panda-NZ-; 24-09-2020 at 03:45 PM.

  8. #1418
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Panda-NZ- View Post
    Considering your last stance(s) on mental health when the lockdowns were announced , you should have more respect and allow people to have good mental health when reading your posts rather than berating them and using cheap terms like "cindy" and "team of incompetents".

    repeating something doesn't make something any more useful or truthful.
    What makes Cindy a cheap name?
    Looking back through previous P.Ms you'll find John for Johnathon.
    Bill for William.
    Jenny for Jennifer.
    Jim for James
    Mike for Michael.
    Rob for Robert,
    and the inexplicable one, Bill for Wallace.
    So Cindy can't be too far off, although I believe she is better known as Cinda

  9. #1419
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    964

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Tim23 made repeated comments which I am happy to call him out on with a bet. The rest of you Labourites gang up and attempt as per usual to deflect and spin your way out - 'Birds of a Feather'.

    Where's the bullying? Calling somebody out with a bet is bullying?

    You should be encouraging him to be a man, take the bet or apologize. It's that simple, RB - but like Cindy, who is back to wearing the hijab today to support the oppression of Muslim women in certain countries, it's all spin, bluff and bluster with you lot.
    It is OK to call someone "grasshopper" but not to reply calling you "old man" ? You are showing your sensitive side.

    westerly

  10. #1420
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,188

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by artemis View Post
    The term bullying is like the term racist these days. Both are formed in the eye and opinion of the speaker. Designed not to inform or educate but to shut down the person on the receiving end. So prevalent now that the term cancel culture has been coined and is gaining currency fast.

    Heh, I just googled it 5.5 million hits. Tell me that doesn't indicate something.
    Debate and discussion is healthy, but so much of the comments here are just name-calling and attacking the person and not discussing the actual issues. And I call that bullying, and that should be shut down. It would be great if you could discuss the issues and not put down people. There is not much on these election threads that is informative. As for being racist, I think it is not whether you are racist or not but how racist, because racism in an unconscious bias.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •