-
01-11-2020, 05:21 PM
#6901
Sir John did a deal with the maori party despite not needing them.
lots of taxpayer money funnelled into second-tier whanau ora schemes and charter schools.
Last edited by Panda-NZ-; 01-11-2020 at 05:23 PM.
-
01-11-2020, 09:50 PM
#6902
-
02-11-2020, 07:51 AM
#6903
Originally Posted by RupertBear
OMG Justakiwiw I had to read that twice to make sure I had read it right and true enough you really did say BONK My Sunday night is now ruined by the thought of Balance bonking
Haha, chill RupertBear - just think George Clooney & Jennifer Lopez 😜
-
02-11-2020, 08:09 AM
#6904
Originally Posted by justakiwi
I said new material, not the same old regurgitated stuff we have had to listen to for months. The election is over. Jacinda and Labour won. Get over it. Have you seriously not got anything better to do with your life/time than drag this debate out for eternity?
I don't always agree with Balance. However, in a democracy, the government should continuously be held to account for its actions and for its delivery of its platform promises.
For example, will it kick the can down the street again in relation to housing as it has already on a capital gains tax? To make itself electable it has basically become a National Party Lite
It is a glorious day - go take the dog for a walk, dig your veggie garden, water some flowers. Or maybe even surprise Mrs Balance with an afternoon bonk.
You will feel better, whichever option you choose. I promise.
You are making a lot of assumptions there. Anyway, it always makes me chuckle when a poster makes a post suggesting that other posters should be doing something else!
-
02-11-2020, 09:11 AM
#6905
Originally Posted by Sgt Pepper
I know political hypocrisy is nothing new but the Greens agreement to disagree with the labour certainly raises the bar. We hold fast to our core values, indeed but we also would like to hold on to our ministerial salaries.!
It's an agreement to 'agree to agree to disagree', according to the female half-leader. Fungus says - Well put lady.
-
02-11-2020, 09:12 AM
#6906
Originally Posted by Balance
Haha, chill RupertBear - just think George Clooney & Jennifer Lopez
Or Steptoe and Enid Sharples
-
02-11-2020, 09:28 AM
#6907
Like I’m the only one here who makes wild assumptions. That’s funny.
Balance took my comments OK, so not sure why they put your jockeys in a knot.
You have a lovely day
Originally Posted by Bjauck
You are making a lot of assumptions there. Anyway, it always makes me chuckle when a poster makes a post suggesting that other posters should be doing something else!
-
02-11-2020, 09:43 AM
#6908
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
It's an agreement to 'agree to agree to disagree', according to the female half-leader. Fungus says - Well put lady.
I watched Sunday on TV One last night. One of the items covered was the $11miilion to the Green School. During the interview with the owners they were asked if they had met directly with Minister Shaw. Not directly, they disclosed, but via a Zoom video . I have issues with this. It is not, in my opinion, right ( or wise )that such direct lobbying occur which results in taxpayers money being dispersed.
He should not be a minister
Last edited by Sgt Pepper; 02-11-2020 at 09:45 AM.
-
02-11-2020, 09:52 AM
#6909
Originally Posted by justakiwi
..
You have a lovely day
Will do. I have just drawn up a new list of kitchen chores for "her indoors". I am expecting great meals today.
-
02-11-2020, 09:58 AM
#6910
Originally Posted by Sgt Pepper
I watched Sunday on TV One last night. One of the items covered was the $11miilion to the Green School. During the interview with the owners they were asked if they had met directly with Minister Shaw. Not directly, they disclosed, but via a Zoom video . I have issues with this. It is not, in my opinion, right ( or wise )that such direct lobbying occur which results in taxpayers money being dispersed.
He should not be a minister
I agree with you Sgt Pepper. I was quite shocked to hear about that on Sunday. In fact I think the whole thing is a fiasco and no Government money should be put forward for something that is simply an idea from wealthy greenies that have zero experience in running an education facility. Meanwhile the primary schools in the wider area have unsuitable buildings to work in.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks