-
21-12-2017, 04:35 PM
#241
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
That's just to set the stage so that once they've turned it into a mess, which is not going to take very long, they can continue to blame the previous administration for 'the mess they inherited.'
Why not . National did it for many years.
westerly
-
21-12-2017, 04:47 PM
#242
Originally Posted by westerly
Why not . National did it for many years.
westerly
True, but for legitimate reasons.
-
21-12-2017, 10:38 PM
#243
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
True, but for legitimate reasons.
Like the poor repayment of old crown debt perhaps. Labour did really badly at that.
-
22-12-2017, 08:03 AM
#244
Remind us what Labour did with the the railways just before they lost to National. And don't forget the the GFC that National handled well in the early part of their governance. Also look at the trend at the end of the graph bearing in mind that Labour have already stated that they will not be reducing at the same rate as what National intended.
Please remember to show us an updated graph in three years time when National are back in power.
Last edited by 777; 22-12-2017 at 08:04 AM.
-
22-12-2017, 08:19 AM
#245
Like the optimism 777. National back would be like applauding trump for his tax cuts, the rich getting richer. National back in power or labour back in govt, im sure the people will see the difference and whats better for them. Already amazing changes. The health system run down by national is the elephant in the room.How many people have died or suffered waiting in vain.
-
22-12-2017, 08:31 AM
#246
Originally Posted by Joshuatree
Like the optimism 777. National back would be like applauding trump for his tax cuts, the rich getting richer. National back in power or labour back in govt, im sure the people will see the difference and whats better for them. Already amazing changes. The health system run down by national is the elephant in the room.How many people have died or suffered waiting in vain.
Pretty revolting post. Mentioning National and this sick US idiot in one sentence is like saying that Labour is worse than the bubonic plague.
JT - You should be ashamed of yourself, if you still have any decency. Given that your posts compute less and less will I put you on ignore. Waste of time.
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
22-12-2017, 08:46 AM
#247
Originally Posted by elZorro
Like the poor repayment of old crown debt perhaps. Labour did really badly at that.
Waste of time, clinging to the past with either party. Times and circumstances change, parties policies change as do the MPs. That is why I'm a swinging voter, as objective voters should be. The current difference between National and Labour is really what matters. And that main difference is Labour is over-run with bleeding heart dreamers of little world experience, while National has people of real life experience, although there are a couple of exceptions in both main parties. Neither party will ever get it all right, annd even the worst parties seem to do the odd sensible thing. Your blind acceptance of Labour's every move, and constant disapproval of National's every utterance, has destroyed your credibility.
-
22-12-2017, 08:52 AM
#248
Originally Posted by BlackPeter
Pretty revolting post. Mentioning National and this sick US idiot in one sentence is like saying that Labour is worse than the bubonic plague.
JT - You should be ashamed of yourself, if you still have any decency. Given that your posts compute less and less will I put you on ignore. Waste of time.
Find the truth and the truth will set you free.. Keep casting stones, i like the rings they make.Maximas Merrimas.
This coalition is for the people and the environment ,im all for that. The alternative is inreasingly obviously transparently selfishly not.Exposed and redundant imo.
Last edited by Joshuatree; 22-12-2017 at 08:56 AM.
-
22-12-2017, 09:05 AM
#249
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
Waste of time, clinging to the past with either party. Times and circumstances change, parties policies change as do the MPs. That is why I'm a swinging voter, as objective voters should be. The current difference between National and Labour is really what matters. And that main difference is Labour is over-run with bleeding heart dreamers of little world experience, while National has people of real life experience, although there are a couple of exceptions in both main parties. Neither party will ever get it all right, annd even the worst parties seem to do the odd sensible thing. Your blind acceptance of Labour's every move, and constant disapproval of National's every utterance, has destroyed your credibility.
Still a lot of bitter twisted combat minded national supporters and members out there seeking revenge. It will ultimately destroy the party and thats a good thing. I look forward to the the new National phoenix arising from the ashes sometime in the distant future when they have learnt to release the ill will rather than hanging on to it at their cost. Forgive and renew and move on.
ps Mudthrowing self appointed judgements coming from a dungeon?
-
22-12-2017, 10:50 AM
#250
Originally Posted by elZorro
Like the poor repayment of old crown debt perhaps. Labour did really badly at that.
Nice chart EZ
Suppose the columns will start getting taller again .....yes?
”When investors are euphoric, they are incapable of recognising euphoria itself “
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks